Affiliation:
1. Belarusian State University
Abstract
The problem of the implementation of international legal support of special operations is a natural, historically determined and in fact staying beyond the conventional scope of international law. In fact, this is an emerging international custom based on the practice of states in defending national interests in conditions of competing jurisdiction, the legalization of the resources of the «shadow» economy, the spread of the Darknet, the development of new ways and means of warfare and its propaganda. The transnationalization of organized crime, its links with international terrorism, corruption, cybercrime, attempts to build national security systems at the expense of the security of others, the destructive ideology of national domination, accompanied by the «privatization» of state sovereignty by non-state actors, substantiates the practice of implementing special operations against existing and newly created existential challenges and threats to the security of states.The institutionalization of some types of international special operations is obvious, based on the provisions of the UN Charter, multilateral and bilateral agreements, correlates with the activities of regional security systems (Collective Security Treaty Organization — CSTO, North Atlantic Treaty Organization — NATO, League of Arab States — LAS, Organization of American States — OAS, Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe — OSCE, etc.). The uniqueness of special operations in each specific case, the impossibility of their absolute legal settlement, especially in the military-political sphere, raises the question of the need to revise a number of provisions of the UN Charter as ineffective, the formation of new (unipolar) regional mechanisms for monitoring their implementation, the activation of special scientific research in this area.
Publisher
Kutafin Moscow State Law University
Reference50 articles.
1. Archakov VYu, Bankovskiy AL, Zenchenko EV. Darknet v kontekste riskov natsionalnoy bezopasnosti [Darknet in the context of national security risks]. Pravo.by. 2021;6(74):5-10. (In Russ.).
2. Bankovskiy AL. K voprosu o kontseptualizatsii v sfere natsionalnoy bezopasnosti [On the issue of conceptualization in the field of national security]. In: Sovremennyy mir i natsionalnye interesy Respubliki Belarus: materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii, Minsk, 17 dek. 2021 g. [The Modern World and the National interests of the Republic of Belarus: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, Minsk, 17 Dec. 2022]. Minsk: BSU Publ.; 2021. Pp. 35–39. (In Russ.).
3. Biryukov PN. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: ucheb. posobie [International law: A study guide]. Moscow: Yurist Publ.; 1998. (In Russ.).
4. Bismillakh M. Mezhdunarodno-pravovoy mekhanizm uregulirovaniya vnutrigosudarstvennykh konfliktov kak yuridicheskaya osnova politiki natsionalnogo primireniya v fganistane: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [The international legal mechanism for the settlement of intra-state conflicts as the legal basis for the policy of national reconciliation in Afghanistan. Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis]. Moscow; 2014. (In Russ.).
5. Boguslavskiy MM. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: uchebnik [International private law: A textbook]. Moscow: Mezhdunar. otnosheniya Publ.; 1994. (In Russ.).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献