Conversations about Hard and Soft Lex Bioetica in the Context of Grand Challenges of the External Environment

Author:

Zakharova M. V.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)

Abstract

The paper is the result of a multidimensional comparative study of the ratio of hard to soft Lex Bioetica application on the modern legal map of the world. In terms of methodology, the study was based on both general and special methods of cognition. The formulation of the doctrinal approaches to the issue of Lex Bioеtica would be impossible without a comparative analysis carried out within the framework of interdisciplinary (comparison of the legal doctrine with the related spheres of knowledge, such as philosophy and sociology), cross-branch (comparative analysis of the approaches used in comparative law, philosophy and theory of law as well as in branch legal disciplines), cross-border (comparison of different national legal systems with each other and with international law provisions), as well as chronological (historical comparative analysis) approaches. Application of the sociological method and the legal modeling method allowed identifying the social foundations of Lex Bioеtica evolution existing in the global legal practice, and outlining the potential ways for the reform of the Russian system in this regard. The study also relied on synergistic research. The synergistic method allowed modelling the evolutionary picture of Lex Bioetica on the legal map of the world. The general conclusion with regard to the evolution of Lex Bioetica in Russia is presented in the form of a scientifically substantiated thesis stating that, in addition to developing Lex Bioetica at the integration level of cooperation (primarily in the Eurasian space), the Russian Federation needs to bring the bioethics-related discourse to the level of hard Lex Bioetica.

Publisher

Kutafin Moscow State Law University

Reference19 articles.

1. Apresyan, R.G., (1995). The idea of morality and basic regulatory and ethical programs. Moscow: Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IFRAN). Pp. 10–11 (In Russ.).

2. Ashcroft, R.E., (2015). Bioethics. In: Wright J., ed., (2015). International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed.

3. Grebenshchikova, E.G., (2010). Transdisciplinary paradigm in bioethics. Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, 2, pp. 79–83 (In Russ.).

4. Jahr, F., (2013). Aufsätze zur Bioethik 1924–1948: Werkausgabe. Berlin: Lit Verlag (In Germ.).

5. Kalinichenko, P.A. and Kosilkin, S.V., (2019). Genomic Research: Council of Europe Standards and Legal Regulation in Russia. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), 4, pp. 108–118, doi: 10.17803/2311-5998.2019.56.4.108-118 (In Russ.).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3