Dismantling monuments as the core of the post-2014 ‘decommunisation’ in Ukraine and Poland
-
Published:2022
Issue:4
Volume:14
Page:146-161
-
ISSN:2310-0524
-
Container-title:Baltic Region
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Balt. Reg.
Author:
Filev Maksim V.1ORCID, Kurganskii Anatolii A.1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
Abstract
Drawing on a wide range of sources (Polish and Ukrainian legal acts, Russian and international media), this study looks at the ‘monument fall’ in Ukraine and Poland as part of the post-2014 memory wars. The purpose of this article is to identify the main patterns associated with the demolition of Soviet and Russian monuments in the two countries. The ‘decommunisation’ of public space is an element of Ukraine’s and Poland’s politics of memory, enshrined in legal acts. Its driving force is the Institutes of National Remembrance, whose priorities include dismantling Soviet and pre-revolutionary Russian monuments, which came into full swing after the beginning of Russia’s special military operation to denazify and demilitarise Ukraine. The official narratives allot Poland and Ukraine the role of victims of ‘two aggressors’ in World War II, which found themselves under ‘communist occupation’. Therefore, the politics of memory of the two countries seek to get rid of the ‘Soviet legacy’ as the legacy of the ‘occupying country’. Whilst Poland pursues ‘residual decommunisation’ focused on dismantling the remaining memorials to Soviet soldiers-liberators, Ukraine is committed to transforming ‘decommunisation’ into full-scale ‘derussification’. At the same time, the process of ‘re-Sovietisation/Sovietisation’ has been launched in the liberated territories of Ukraine. It consists in restoring previously destroyed monuments or installing new ones.
Publisher
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),History,Cultural Studies,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference32 articles.
1. 1. Filippova, E. I. 2011, History and memory in the epoch of dominating identities: an interview with Pierre Nora, historian and member of the French Academy, Ethno review, № 4, p. 75—84 (in Russ.). 2. 2. Repina, L. P. 2020, Historical memory and national narratives of identity: “the practice of history in the service of memory”, In: Repina, L. P. (ed.), The past for the present: history/memory and narratives of national identity, Moscow, Akvilon, p. 11—36 (in Russ.). 3. 3. Malinova, O. Ju. 2018, Memory policy as a Symbolic policy area, In: Miller, A. I., Efremenko, D. V. (eds.), Methodological issues of studying the politics of memory, Moscow, Saint-Petersburg, Nestor-Istorija, p. 27—53 (in Russ.). 4. 4. Kasianov, G. 2021, «Decommunisation» in Ukraine: 2014—2021: the process, actors, results, Historical expertise, № 4, p. 174—200, https://doi.org/10.31754/2409-6105-2021-4-174-200 (in Russ.). 5. 5. Miller, A. I., Efremenko, D. V. (eds.). 2018, Methodological issues of studying the politics of memory, Moscow, Saint-Petersburg, Nestor-Istorija, 224 р. (in Russ.).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|