Right to Effective Legal Remedy in Criminal Proceedings in the EU. Implementation and Need for Standards

Author:

Kiejnich-Kruk KarolinaORCID,Wiliński PawełORCID

Abstract

In order to secure rights and guarantees provided by the legal system of the European Union, legal acts in the field of the criminal cooperation refer to the right to an effective remedy. Given that, two instruments are particularly impor­tant as they were the first to aim to set the standard and frame for the effective remedy conceptual framework: the Directive 2013/48/EU and the Directive (EU) 2016/343. The Authors analyse the legislation process within that context, the ap­proach of Member States, (non)existing standards and related consequences, such as the possibilities of proper implementa­tion of the right to the effective remedy into the national legal systems, verification of that process as well as the chances to achieve the harmonisation of minimal standards of the protec­tion of fundamental rights in the area of criminal proceedings in the EU.

Publisher

Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawla II

Subject

Development,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference30 articles.

1. Auke, Willems. The Principle of Mutual Trust in EU Criminal Law. Oxford et al.: Hart, 2021.

2. Barkhuysen, Tom, and Michiel L. van Emmerik. “Chapter 32: Right to an Effective Remedy.” In Theory and Practice of the European Convention of Human Rights, edited by Pieter Van Dijk, Fried van Hoof, Arjen van Rijn, and Leo Zwaak, 1035–1061. Cambridge-Antwerp-Portland: Intersentia, 2018.

3. Biral, Marianna, Isadora Neroni Rezende, Giulia Lasagni, Emanuele Gatto, Alessandra Santangelo, Irene Milazzo, Laura Bartoli, Antonio Pugliese, and Vanessa Maraldi, The Italian Implementation of the EU Directives on Pro-cedural Safeguards for Accused Persons in Criminal Proceedings. Accessed September 25, 2023. https://sistemapenale.it/pdf_contenuti/1669131660_re¬port-italiano-crossjustice.pdf.

4. Caianiello, Michele, and Giulia Lasagni. “Comparative Remarks.” In Effective Protection of the Rights of the Accused in the EU Directives, edited by Giu¬seppe Contissa, Giulia Lasagni, Michele Caianiello, and Giovanni Sartor, 229–258. Leiden: Brill Nijhof, 2022.

5. Cras, Steven, and Anže Erbežnik. “The Directive on the Presumption of Inno¬cence and the Right to Be Present at Trial.” Eucrim, no. 1 (2016): 25–36.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3