Abstract
This paper on financial regulation addresses the extent to which rules on liability for information should be standardized across the EU/EEA region. The method applied is an analysis of legal documents. My finding is that further harmonization may lead to difficulties concerning procedural rules. Some authors suggest harmonizing the civil procedure for prospectus liability cases. This could reduce asymmetric information and thus contribute to efficient markets. However, mandatory disclosure comes with costs. These may increase if standards inconsistent with domestic procedures are imposed. The topic may be of interest for regulating other aspects of life, such as environmental information disclosure.
Publisher
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawla II
Reference14 articles.
1. Akerlof, George A. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84, no. 3 (1970): 488–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431.
2. Andenas, Mads, and Duncan Fairgrieve. Courts and Comparative Law, 1st ed. Oxford: University Press, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735335.001.0001.
3. Bainbridge, Stephen M. “Don’t Compound the Caremark Mistake by Extending It to ESG Oversight.” The Business Lawyer 77, no. 3 (2022): 651–77.
4. Beekhoven van den Boezem, Frits-Joost, Corjo Jansen, and Ben Schuijling. Sustainability and Financial Markets. Vol. 17: Law of Business and Finance. Deventer: Wolters Kluwer, 2019.
5. Bergo, Knut. “Sannsynlighet, forventning og mulighet – kommentarer til HR-2022-695-A.” Juridika, 12 September 2022. Accessed June 18, 2023. https://juridika.no/tidsskrifter/tidsskrift-for-forretningsjus/2022/1/artikkel/bergo.