COERCED STERILIZATION AS A REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS VIOLATION

Author:

Iemelianenko Volodymyr1,Alesia Gornostay1,Nataliya Maslak1

Affiliation:

1. YAROSLAV MUDRYI NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, KHARKIV, UKRAINE

Abstract

The aim: To outline and systematize the issues related to violations and restrictions on the realization of the right to reproduction. To develop propositions and recommendations on improving the prevention and combating various manifestations of coerced sterilization. Materials and methods: Theoretical basis for studying this issue includes scientific publications, research of the legislative systems of different countries, the conclusions of international non-governmental organizations. The authors of the paper have also taken into account international regulations, including UN Conventions and Directives, decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), as well as analytical data provided by international organizations. Determinants in the study of this problem are the analysis, synthesis and generalization of the experience and legislative base of foreign countries, which are closely related to formal and comparative methods. Systematic, structural, dialectical and statistical methods have been also used in this paper to substantiate the problem of sterilization. Conclusions: The most radical decision to refuse from reproduction is surgical sterilization (defertilization). It can be classified as voluntary, forced and coerced. The problems of preventing and combating coerced sterilization are among the most difficult ones. Bribery and mental coercion of persons in order to obtain consent for sterilization are either not regulated by law and do not entail any liability, including criminal, or even are part of the state government policy to regulate the number of citizens in overpopulated countries, HIV-infected people, including prisoners or transgender people.

Publisher

ALUNA

Subject

General Medicine

Reference35 articles.

1. 1. Pashkov V., Hutorova N., Noha P. Reproductive function: the protection of the rightsof the people wich are sent to the area of the fighting. Wiad. Lek. 2018, 2: 403–407.

2. 2. Biletska E., Onul N. et al. Current tendencies in the nutrition of women and pregnant women of industrial region of Ukraine and their influence on microelements supply. Wiad. Lek. 2018, 4: 843-848.

3. 3. Pashkov V., Lyfar A. Assisted reproductive technologies: the problems of legal enforcement. Wiad. Lek. 2018, 5: 1066–1070.

4. 4. Horodovenko V., Pashkov V., Udovyka L.: Protection of patients' rights in the European Court of Human Rights. Wiad. Lek. 2018, 6: 1200–1206.

5. 5. Programmer of action of the International conference on population and development (ICPD) Cairo, Egypt 5/13/1994. Available from: https://www. unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/icpd_rus.pdf [reviewed 2020.08.12].

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3