Elections as an Institution of Trust: Features of Functioning in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author:

Baranov N. A.1

Affiliation:

1. Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA)

Abstract

The article is devoted to identifying the features of the functioning of elections as a democratic institution in a pandemic. Based on the constructivist approach and the method of comparative analysis, the author attempts to conceptualize elections as an institution of trust and to characterize the electoral practices used by European countries in the electoral process. Based on the research of D. Coleman, N. Luhmann, R. Putnam, P. Roseanvallon, P. Shtompka, I. Krastev, F. Fukuyama, D. Gambetto, the author, despite the ambiguity of the concept of “trust”, concludes that it is essential role in the relationship between government and society. Mistrust means the alienation of society from the social sphere, lack of faith in justice, a feeling of uncertainty and a threat emanating from government institutions. Trust creates a moral environment in society that promotes development and effective problem solving. In an atmosphere of trust, various voting options are possible, which are not disputed by citizens, and elections become the most important indicator of this trust. Pandemic restrictions have left a significant imprint on electoral practices; nevertheless, there is an obvious trend towards the active introduction of remote electronic voting, which has not yet reached perfection, but is a strategically priority in the ongoing election campaigns. At the same time, increased requirements are imposed on the safety of the electoral process, its normative regulation, openness and publicity.

Publisher

The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Reference25 articles.

1. Alekseev R. A., Abramov A. V. Problems and prospects of using electronic voting and electoral blockchain technology in Russia and abroad // Citizen. Elections. Power [Grazhdanin. Vybory. Vlast’]. 2020. N 1 (15). P. 9–21. (In Rus).

2. Besset J. M. Quiet voice of reason. Deliberative Democracy and the American System of Government. M. : Russian Political Encyclopedia (ROSSPEN), 2011. 336 p. (In Rus).

3. Borisov I. B., Golovin A. G., Ignatov A. V. Elections in the world: electronic voting / total. ed. I. B. Borisov. M. : Russian Public Institute of Electoral Law, 2020. 218 p. (In Rus).

4. Dahl R. Democracy and its critics. M. : ROSSPEN, 2003. 576 p. (In Rus)

5. Krastev I. Management of mistrust. M. : Publishing house “Europe”, 2014. 128 p. (In Rus).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3