Learner Discipline and Democratic Rights: Stakeholders’ Perspectives on the Effectiveness of Discipline Policies

Author:

Moremi Ntsako Shereen1ORCID,Themane Mahlapahlapana1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Educational Studies, Faculty of Humanities, University of Limpopo, Sovenga, South Africa.

Abstract

This article investigated how school stakeholders perceive the effectiveness of current policies and government Acts on learner discipline. Learner ill-disciplined behaviour is a daily occurrence in today’s classrooms. The question addressed was: What are the stakeholders’ perspectives on the effectiveness of the current policies and government Acts on learner discipline? To answer this question, the study adopted the qualitative approach and a case study design. 12 participants were recruited using the purposive non-probability sampling approach from three primary schools in Rakwadu 1 Circuit, Limpopo Province, South Africa. The sample comprised three principals, three departmental heads involved in the school disciplinary committees, three class teachers, and three representatives of the school’s governing body. Data was gathered using interviews and document analysis. Bandura’s Social Cognitive Learning Theory underpinned the study. The study found that policies and government Acts on learner discipline were ineffective. They failed to help schools to successfully manage ill-discipline. It was also found that stakeholders had inadequate knowledge of policies and government Acts on discipline. It was recommended that the Basic Education Department provide training to school stakeholders regarding policies and government Acts pertaining to learner discipline. The paper will contribute significantly to transformative scholarship on the promotion of teaching and learning. The article may also be helpful to stakeholders who are hard-pressed to find answers for their schools. Keywords: Learner Discipline, Democratic Rights, Discipline Policies,Ill-Discipline, Stakeholders

Publisher

Noyam Publishers

Reference28 articles.

1. Bandura, A, and P Hall. “Albert Bandura and Social Learning Theory.” Learning Theories for Early Years 78 (2018).

2. Bandura, Albert, and Richard H Walters. Social Learning Theory. Vol. 1. Englewood cliffs Prentice Hall, 1977.

3. Bussu, Sonia, Mirza Lalani, Stephen Pattison, and Martin Marshall. “Engaging with Care: Ethical Issues in Participatory Research.” Qualitative Research 21, no. 5 (2021): 667–85.

4. Buys, Irma. “A Restorative Approach towards School Discipline and Behavioural Conduct in South African Schools: A Case Study.” University of South Africa, 2018.

5. Campbell, Steve, Melanie Greenwood, Sarah Prior, Toniele Shearer, Kerrie Walkem, Sarah Young, Danielle Bywaters, and Kim Walker. “Purposive Sampling: Complex or Simple? Research Case Examples.” Journal of Research in Nursing 25, no. 8 (2020): 652–61.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3