Prevalence of the use of oral nutritional supplements among acute inpatients at risk of malnutrition and associated patient characteristics

Abstract

AbstractAimTo provide a snapshot of the current use of oral nutritional supplements, its association with inpatient characteristics, and with a focus on the role of nursing monitoring of food intake and implementing nutritional interventions for patients with low intake.DesignRetrospective cohort study.MethodsThe study collected data from a hospital database regarding oral nutritional supplement initiation and variables of patients hospitalised in internal medicine departments, who did not receive enteral or parenteral nutrition.ResultsOf the 5155 admissions, 1087 fulfilled the inclusion criteria (47% female; mean age, 72.4 ± 14.6 years; mean length of stay, 14.6 ± 11.4 days). Sufficient food intake reporting was noted in 74.6% of the patients; of these 17% had decreased intake. Oral nutritional supplements and non‐oral nutritional supplements groups did not differ in terms of sex, age, length of stay, Charlson Comorbidity Index, proportion of nursing reports, and absence of intake monitoring. Oral nutritional supplements were initiated in 31.9% of patients with a Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool score ≥2 and in 34.6% with decreased food intake. On multivariable analysis, hypoalbuminemia (adjusted odds ratio, 3.70), decreased food intake (adjusted odds ratio, 3.38), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool score ≥2 (adjusted odds ratio, 2.10), and age <70 years (adjusted odds ratio, 1.56) were significantly associated with oral nutritional supplements use.ConclusionThe prevalence of oral nutritional intervention was suboptimal in patients at risk of malnutrition during acute hospitalisation, although decreased food intake and Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool score ≥2 independently increased the probability of oral nutritional supplements initiation.Relevance in clinical practiceUnderstanding the clinical practice and nursing impact of care management in relation to nutritional intervention can assist in reviewing and improving patient care.Implications for the profession and/or patient care Impact (Addressing)This study informs clinical management and influences nursing practice standards related to assessing, monitoring, and managing malnutrition risk.ImpactThe study impacts the quality of care for patients at risk of malnutrition.Reporting MethodWe adhered to the STROBE Checklist for cohort studies.Patient or Public ContributionNo Patient or Public Contribution.