Affiliation:
1. University of Manchester
Abstract
The organization of the medical and legal professions in Britain has depended heavily on ideologies of self-regulation, and on different institutional creations inspired by those ideologies. Self-regulation balances professions between the market and the state. In recent years both medicine and the law have been subjected to greater competition in the market, and greater control by the state. Part of the explanation for change lies in conditions particular to medicine and law but the similarity in recent regulatory experiences can only be explained by the working of common external forces. Two are identified: the impact of long-term cultural change on a regulatory balancing act originally created in an undemocratic and hierarchical society; and the impact of a modernizing elite in British government seeking to use state power to reverse the decline in British competitiveness.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. A planetary guide to lawyer funambulism?
Lawyers in 21st‐Century Societies, Volume 1: National Reports
, EDITED BY RICHARD L.ABEL, OLEHAMMERSLEV, HILARYSOMMERLAD, ULRIKESCHULTZ, Oxford: Hart, 2020, 956 pp., £275.00
Lawyers in 21st‐Century Societies, Volume 2: Comparisons and Theories
, EDITED BY RICHARD L.ABEL, HILARYSOMMERLAD, OLEHAMMERSLEV, ULRIKESCHULTZ, Oxford: Hart, 2022, 704 pp., £190.00;Journal of Law and Society;2022-10-26
2. The State Recreated;The End of British Politics?;2016-12-20
3. Self-regulating professions: past, present, future: Table 1.;Journal of Professions and Organization;2016-10-14
4. The recontextualization of commercialization: the shifting discourse of an R&D unit;International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy;2010-06-22
5. Profession: A Useful Concept for Sociological Analysis?;Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie;2010-02