Abstract
Aguinis and Glavas (2013) offer a new attempt to explain the consistently weak but consistently inconsistent findings regarding the relationship of corporate social responsibility (CSR) to financial performance. Like many others writing in the field, Aguinis and Glavas appear to believe that further efforts to categorize types of CSR will somehow identify CSR forms that are financially rewarding. In this response, I challenge four assumptions underlying the Aguinis and Glavas manuscript: (a) that CSR has received little attention in the micro literature; (b) that CSR can be meaningfully conceptualized and operationalized; (c) that a continued search for the “holy grail” of a CSR–financial performance link is likely to be fruitful; and (d) that the “peripheral–embedded” distinction is useful and appropriate.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Applied Psychology,Social Psychology
Reference21 articles.
1. Measurement and correlates of social attitudes
2. Assessment of attitudes toward social responsibilities;Aldag;Journal of Business Administration,1977
3. Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises
4. Loten A. (2013). Can firms aim to do good if it hurts profits? Wall Street Journal, April 11, B6.
5. Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献