Decision coaching for people with kidney failure: A case study

Author:

Buur Louise Engelbrecht123ORCID,Bekker Hilary Louise234,Mathiesen Caroline Løntoft5,Holm Lotte Timmerby6,Riise Ida6,Finderup Jeanette127ORCID,Stacey Dawn89

Affiliation:

1. Department of Renal Medicine Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark

2. Research Centre for Patient Involvement (ResCenPI) Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark

3. Department of Public Health Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark

4. Leeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), Leeds Institute of Health Science University of Leeds Leeds UK

5. Department of Cardiology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark

6. Department of Neurosurgery Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark

7. Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark

8. Centre for Practice Changing Research Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Canada

9. School of Nursing University of Ottawa Ottawa Canada

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundLittle is known about the usefulness of decision coaching for people with kidney failure facing decisions about end‐of‐life care.ObjectivesTo investigate experiences of people with kidney failure who received decision coaching for end‐of‐life care decisions.DesignWe conducted a prospective case study bound by time (September to December 2021), location (one nephrology department), and guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework.ParticipantsAdults with kidney failure facing end‐of‐life care decisions.MeasurementsA nurse trained in decision coaching screened for unmet decisional needs with the SURE test and provided decision coaching using the Ottawa Personal Decision Guide. Postcoaching, the participants were rescreened using the SURE test and interviewed to explore their experience with decision coaching. Change in SURE test findings was analysed descriptively and systematic text condensation was used for the analysis of interviews. Recorded decision coaching sessions underwent content analysis using the Decision Support Analysis Tool.ResultsDecision coaching was provided to four adults with kidney failure. Median pre‐SURE test score was 2.5 (range 2–4) and posttest score was 3 (range 3–4), indicating a decrease in decisional needs. Participants described that decision coaching provided an overview of features of options to consider, identified remaining decisional needs for further discussion with relatives and health professionals and clarified next steps. Median Decision Support Analysis Tool score was 9 (range 8–9).ConclusionsAfter decision coaching, results suggest that the participants experienced fewer decisional needs and seemed clearer about the next steps in the decision making process.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Nephrology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3