Shared decision making for patients with kidney failure to improve end‐of‐life care: Development of the DESIRE intervention

Author:

Buur Louise Engelbrecht123ORCID,Bekker Hilary Louise234ORCID,Søndergaard Henning5,Kannegaard Michell6,Madsen Jens Kristian1ORCID,Khatir Dinah Sherzad17,Finderup Jeanette127ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Renal Medicine Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark

2. Research Centre for Patient Involvement (ResCenPI) Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark

3. Department of Public Health Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark

4. Leeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID) Leeds Institute of Health Science, School of Medicine, University of Leeds Leeds UK

5. The Danish Kidney Association Taastrup Denmark

6. Profession School UCN act2learn Aalborg Denmark

7. Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark

Abstract

AbstractAimTo describe the development of a shared decision making intervention for planning end‐of‐life care for patients with kidney failure, their relatives and health professionals in kidney services.BackgroundEnd‐of‐life care conversations within standard disease management consultations are challenging for patients with kidney failure, their relatives and health professionals. End‐of‐life care planning is about making difficult decisions in advance, which is why health professionals need shared decision making skills to be able to initiate end‐of‐life conversations. Health professionals report needing more skills to raise the issue of end‐of‐life care options within consultations and patients want to be able to discuss issues important to them about future care plans.MethodsThe development design was guided by the UK Medical Research Council's framework and a user‐centred approach was applied. Four workshops were conducted with end users. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication for Population Health and Policy interventions was used to shape which questions needed to be answered through the workshops and to present the intervention. The International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) criteria set the standards to be achieved.ResultsAreas considered significant to a shared decision making intervention were training of health professionals, conversations about end‐of‐life care, planning and evaluation of the decisions, reporting decisions in health records and repetition of consultation. The development process went through 14 iterations.ConclusionAn intervention named DESIRE was developed that comprises: (1) a training programme for health professionals; (2) shared decision making conversations; and (3) a patient decision aid. The intervention met 30 out of 33 IPDAS criteria.Implications for practiceDESIRE is intended to support shared decision making about planning end‐of‐life care among patients with kidney failure, their relatives and health professionals. The study provides important tools for the stakeholders engaged that can be used within different models of care.ImpactWhat problem did the study address?International guidelines recommend health professionals involve patients with kidney failure in making decisions about end‐of‐life care, but there is variation in how this is implemented within and across kidney services. Furthermore, patients, relatives and health professionals find it challenging to initiate conversations about end‐of‐life care.What were the main findings?The study resulted in the development of a complex intervention, called DESIRE, about shared decision making and planning end‐of‐life care for patients with kidney failure, their relatives and health professionals in kidney services, including a training programme for health professionals, shared decision making conversations and a patient decision aid.Where and on whom will the research have an impact?The research contributes a shared decision making intervention to patients in the later stage of kidney failure, their relatives and health professionals. We believe that the DESIRE intervention could be introduced during consultations with health professionals at an earlier stage of the patient's illness trajectory, as well as being applied to other chronic diseases.Reporting MethodThis intervention development research is reported according to the GUIDance for the rEporting of intervention Development (GUIDED) checklist and the DEVELOPTOOLS Reporting Checklist.Patient or Public ContributionPatients, relatives and health professionals have been involved throughout the research process as part of the research team and advisory board. For this study, the advisory board has particularly contributed to the development process of the DESIRE intervention by actively participating in the four workshops, in the iterations between the workshops and in the preparation of the manuscript.

Funder

Augustinus Fonden

Publisher

Wiley

Reference41 articles.

1. Bekker H.(2020).Psychometric testing of SHARED ‐ a patient reported outcome measure of shared decision making. Available from:http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/158425/1/SHARED_Questionnaire_2020.pdf

2. Patient involvement interventions for patients with kidney failure making end-of-life care decisions: a scoping review

3. Decision coaching for people with kidney failure: A case study

4. Decisional needs in people with kidney failure, their relatives and health professionals about end‐of‐life care options: A qualitative interview study;Buur L. E.;Journal of Advanced Nursing,2024

5. Shared decision-making and planning end-of-life care for patients with end-stage kidney disease: a protocol for developing and testing a complex intervention

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3