Hyperangulated vs. Macintosh videolaryngoscopy in adults with anticipated difficult airway management: a randomised controlled trial

Author:

Köhl Vera1ORCID,Wünsch Viktor A.1ORCID,Müller Marie‐Claire1ORCID,Sasu Phillip B.1ORCID,Dohrmann Thorsten1ORCID,Peters Tanja1,Tolkmitt Josephine1ORCID,Dankert André1ORCID,Krause Linda2ORCID,Zöllner Christian1,Petzoldt Martin1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine University Medical Centre Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

2. Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology University Medical Centre Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundIt is not certain whether the blade geometry of videolaryngoscopes, either a hyperangulated or Macintosh shape, affects glottic view, success rate and/or tracheal intubation time in patients with expected difficult airways. We hypothesised that using a hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blade would visualise a higher percentage of glottic opening compared with a Macintosh videolaryngoscope blade in patients with expected difficult airways.MethodsWe conducted an open‐label, patient‐blinded, randomised controlled trial in adult patients scheduled to undergo elective ear, nose and throat or oral and maxillofacial surgery, who were anticipated to have a difficult airway. All airway operators were consultant anaesthetists. Patients were allocated randomly to tracheal intubation with either hyperangulated (C‐MAC D‐BLADE™) or Macintosh videolaryngoscope blades (C‐MAC™). The primary outcome was the percentage of glottic opening. First attempt success was designated a key secondary outcome.ResultsWe assessed 2540 adults scheduled for elective head and neck surgery for eligibility and included 182 patients with expected difficult airways undergoing orotracheal intubation. The percentage of glottic opening visualised, expressed as median (IQR [range]), was 89 (69–99 [0–100])% with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blades and 54 (9–90 [0–100])% with Macintosh videolaryngoscope blades (p < 0.001). First‐line hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy failed in one patient and Macintosh videolaryngoscopy in 12 patients (13%, p = 0.002). First attempt success rate was 97% with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blades and 67% with Macintosh videolaryngoscope blades (p < 0.001).ConclusionsGlottic view and first attempt success rate were superior with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blades compared with Macintosh videolaryngoscope blades when used by experienced anaesthetists in patients with difficult airways.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3