Prospective development and validation of a universal classification for paediatric videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation: the PeDiAC score

Author:

Dohrmann Thorsten1ORCID,Gutsche Nelly1,Kramer Rilana1,Zeidler Eva M.1,Röher Katharina1ORCID,Wünsch Viktor A.1ORCID,Dankert André1ORCID,Krause Linda2ORCID,Zöllner Christian1,Sasu Phillip B.1ORCID,Petzoldt Martin1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine University Medical Centre Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

2. Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundThe VIDIAC score, a prospectively developed universal classification for videolaryngoscopy, has shown excellent diagnostic performance in adults. However, there is no reliable classification system for videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation in children. We aimed to develop and validate a multivariable logistic regression model and easy‐to‐use score to classify difficult videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation in children and to compare it with the Cormack and Lehane classification. A secondary aim was to externally validate the VIDIAC score in children.MethodsWe conducted a prospective observational study within a structured universal videolaryngoscopy implementation programme. We used C‐MAC™ videolaryngoscopes in all children undergoing tracheal intubation for elective surgical procedures. We validated the VIDIAC score externally and assessed its performance. We then identified eligible co‐variables for inclusion in the PeDiAC score, developed a multivariable logistic regression model and compared its performance against the Cormack and Lehane classification.ResultsWe studied 809 children undergoing 904 episodes of tracheal intubation. The VIDIAC score outperformed the Cormack and Lehane classification when classifying the difficulty of videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80 (95%CI 0.73–0.87) vs. 0.69 (95%CI 0.62–0.76), respectively, p = 0.018. Eight eligible tracheal intubation‐related factors, that were selected by 100‐times repeated 10‐fold cross‐validated least absolute shrinkage selector operator regression, were used to develop the PeDiAC model. The PeDiAC model and score showed excellent diagnostic performance and model calibration. The PeDiAC score achieved significantly better diagnostic performance than the Cormack and Lehane classification, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.97 (95%CI 0.96–0.99) vs. 0.69 (95%CI 0.62–0.76), respectively, p < 0.001.ConclusionWe developed and validated a specifically tailored classification for paediatric videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation with excellent diagnostic performance and calibration that outperformed the Cormack and Lehane classification.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3