Optimising Precision and Power by Machine Learning in Randomised Trials with Ordinal and Time-to-Event Outcomes with an Application to COVID-19

Author:

Williams Nicholas1,Rosenblum Michael2,Díaz Iván3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health , New York City, New York , USA

2. Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, Maryland , USA

3. Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine , New York City, New York , USA

Abstract

Abstract The rapid finding of effective therapeutics requires efficient use of available resources in clinical trials. Covariate adjustment can yield statistical estimates with improved precision, resulting in a reduction in the number of participants required to draw futility or efficacy conclusions. We focus on time-to-event and ordinal outcomes. When more than a few baseline covariates are available, a key question for covariate adjustment in randomised studies is how to fit a model relating the outcome and the baseline covariates to maximise precision. We present a novel theoretical result establishing conditions for asymptotic normality of a variety of covariate-adjusted estimators that rely on machine learning (e.g., ℓ1-regularisation, Random Forests, XGBoost, and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines [MARS]), under the assumption that outcome data are missing completely at random. We further present a consistent estimator of the asymptotic variance. Importantly, the conditions do not require the machine learning methods to converge to the true outcome distribution conditional on baseline variables, as long as they converge to some (possibly incorrect) limit. We conducted a simulation study to evaluate the performance of the aforementioned prediction methods in COVID-19 trials. Our simulation is based on resampling longitudinal data from over 1500 patients hospitalised with COVID-19 at Weill Cornell Medicine New York Presbyterian Hospital. We found that using ℓ1-regularisation led to estimators and corresponding hypothesis tests that control type 1 error and are more precise than an unadjusted estimator across all sample sizes tested. We also show that when covariates are not prognostic of the outcome, ℓ1-regularisation remains as precise as the unadjusted estimator, even at small sample sizes (n=100). We give an R package adjrct that performs model-robust covariate adjustment for ordinal and time-to-event outcomes.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Economics and Econometrics,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Statistics and Probability

Reference65 articles.

1. A class of Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon type statistics;Ahmad;The American Statistician,1996

2. A substantial and confusing variation exists in handling of baseline covariates in randomized controlled trials: a review of trials published in leading medical journals;Austin;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,2010

3. High-dimensional inference for the average treatment effect under model misspecification using penalized bias-reduced double-robust estimation;Avagyan;Biostatistics & Epidemiology,2021

4. Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine;Baden;The New England Journal of Medicine,2021

5. Improved estimation of the cumulative incidence of rare outcomes;Benkeser;Statistics in Medicine,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3