Anthropometric and sociodemographic variables, but not preconception or prenatal maternal nutrition supplementation, predict neurodevelopment in offspring of the ‘Women First’ trial

Abstract

AbstractMultiple factors influence infant and child neurodevelopment in low resource settings. In offspring of participants in the preconception maternal nutrition trial, Women First (WF), we examined the impact of providing a preconception (Arm 1) or prenatal (Arm 2) nutrient supplement (compared to controls, Arm 3) on neurodevelopmental outcomes at 24 months; predictors of neurodevelopment scores; and associations of infant anthropometrics with neurodevelopmental scores. Follow‐up visits for anthropometry were conducted at 6‐, 12‐, 18‐ and 24‐month of age. At 24‐months, in a randomized subset, the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 3rd edition (BSID‐III), including cognitive, motor and social‐emotional subscales, and the Family Care Indicators (FCI) questionnaire, assessing family and home environment, were completed. Multiple covariates (intervention arm, site, maternal sociodemographic characteristics, FCI subscales, birthweight and 6–24 months' change in anthropometry z‐scores, (e.g., ΔLAZ6–24) were evaluated by linear regression to predict BSID‐III outcomes and to assess associations of anthropometric changes with BSID‐III scores. The analysis consisted of 1386 infants (n = 441, 486, 459 for Arms 1, 2 and 3, respectively). None of the domain‐specific BSID‐III subscale scores differed by maternal intervention arm. Four covariates significantly predicted (p ≤ 0.01) all 3 BSID‐III subscales: secondary maternal education, ΔLAZ6–24, birthweight >2500 g, and FCI play materials. Linear growth was associated with all domains of neurodevelopment. The results underscore the multi‐dimensional aspects of child development represented by the nurturing care framework, including prenatal maternal nutrition, post‐natal growth, maternal education for responsive caregiving and opportunities for early learning.