Time to prerandomization seizure count design sufficiently assessed the safety and tolerability of perampanel for the treatment of primary generalized tonic–clonic seizures

Author:

Kerr Wesley T.12ORCID,Ngo Leock Y.3,Zhu Liang4,Patten Anna5,Cheng Jocelyn Y.4,Reddy Advith S.1,French Jacqueline A.6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

2. Department of Biomedical Informatics University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

3. Formerly Eisai Nutley New Jersey USA

4. Eisai Nutley New Jersey USA

5. Eisai Europe Hatfield Hertfordshire UK

6. Comprehensive Epilepsy Center New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York New York USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveStatic assignment of participants in randomized clinical trials to placebo or ineffective treatment confers risk from continued seizures. An alternative trial design of time to exceed prerandomization monthly seizure count (T‐PSC) has replicated the efficacy conclusions of traditionally designed trials, with shorter exposure to placebo and ineffective treatment. Trials aim to evaluate efficacy as well as safety and tolerability; therefore, we evaluated whether this T‐PSC design also could replicate the trial's safety and tolerability conclusions.MethodsWe retrospectively applied the T‐PSC design to analyze treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) from a blinded, placebo‐controlled trial of perampanel for primary generalized tonic–clonic seizures (NCT01393743). The safety analysis set consisted of 81 and 82 participants randomized to perampanel and placebo arms, respectively. We evaluated the incidences of TEAEs, treatment‐related TEAEs, serious TEAEs, and TEAEs of special interest that occurred before T‐PSC relative to those observed during the full‐length trial.ResultsOf the 67 and 59 participants who experienced TEAEs in the perampanel and placebo arms during full‐length trial, 66 (99%) and 54 (92%) participants experienced TEAEs with onset occurring before T‐PSC, respectively. When limited to treatment‐related TEAEs, 55 of 56 (98%) and 32 of 37 (86%) participants reported treatment‐related TEAEs that occurred before T‐PSC in the perampanel and placebo arms, respectively. There were more TEAEs after T‐PSC with placebo as compared to perampanel (Fisher exact odds ratio = 8.6, p = .035), which resulted in overestimation of the difference in TEAE rate. There was a numerical reduction in serious TEAEs (3/13 occurred after T‐PSC, one in placebo and two in perampanel).SignificanceAlmost all TEAEs occurred before T‐PSC. More treatment‐related TEAEs occurred after T‐PSC for participants randomized to placebo than perampanel, which may be due to either a shorter T‐PSC or delayed time to TEAE for placebo.

Funder

American Brain Foundation

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke

American Academy of Neurology

American Epilepsy Society

Epilepsy Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3