Increasing challenges to trial recruitment and conduct over time

Author:

Kerr Wesley T.123ORCID,Reddy Advith S.1,Seo Sung Hyun1,Kok Neo1,Stacey William C.14ORCID,Stern John M.5ORCID,Pennell Page B.2ORCID,French Jacqueline A.6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA

2. Department of Neurology University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

3. Department of Biomedical Informatics University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

4. Department of Biomedical Engineering University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA

5. Department of Neurology David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles California USA

6. Comprehensive Epilepsy Center New York University New York New York USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThis study was undertaken to evaluate how the challenges in the recruitment and retention of participants in clinical trials for focal onset epilepsy have changed over time.MethodsIn this systematic analysis of randomized clinical trials of adjunct antiseizure medications for medication‐resistant focal onset epilepsy, we evaluated how the numbers of participants, sites, and countries have changed since the first such trial in 1990. We also evaluated the proportion of participants who completed each trial phase and their reasons for early trial exit. We analyzed these trends using mixed effects generalized linear models accounting for the influence of the number of trial sites and trial‐specific variability.ResultsThe number of participants per site has steadily decreased over decades, with recent trials recruiting fewer than five participants per site (reduction by .16 participants/site/year, p < .0001). Fewer participants also progressed from recruitment to randomization over time (odds ratio = .94/year, p = .014). Concurrently, there has been an increase in the placebo response over time (increase in median percent reduction of .4%/year, p = .02; odds ratio of increase in 50% responder rate of 1.03/year, p = .02), which was not directly associated with the number of sites per trial (p > .20).SignificanceThis historical analysis highlights the increasing challenges with participant recruitment and retention, as well as increasing placebo response. It serves as a call to action to change clinical trial design to address these challenges.

Funder

American Academy of Neurology

American Brain Foundation

American Epilepsy Society

Epilepsy Foundation

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3