Frailty knowledge, training and barriers to frailty management: A national cross‐sectional survey of health professionals in Australia

Author:

Shafiee Hanjani Leila1ORCID,Fox Sarah1,Hubbard Ruth E.1,Gordon Emily1,Reid Natasha1,Hilmer Sarah N.2,Saunders Rosemary3ORCID,Gnjidic Danijela4,Young Adrienne1

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

2. Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney and Royal North Shore Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia

3. Centre for Research in Aged Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery Edith Cowan University Joondalup Western Australia Australia

4. Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractObjective(s)To understand Australian health professionals' perceptions of their knowledge and previous training about frailty, as well as barriers to frailty assessment and management in their practice.MethodsA cross‐sectional online survey was developed and distributed to health professionals (medical, nursing and allied health) engaged in clinical practice in Australia through convenience and snowball sampling techniques from March to May 2022. The survey consisted of five sections: frailty training and knowledge; confidence in recognising and managing adults with frailty; the importance and relevance of frailty; barriers to assessing and managing frailty in practice; and interest in further frailty training. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics.ResultsThe survey was taken by 736 health professionals. Less than half of respondents (44%, 321/733) reported receiving any training on frailty, with 14% (105/733) receiving training specifically focussed on frailty. Most respondents (78%, 556/712) reported ‘good’ or ‘fair’ understanding of frailty. The majority (64%, 448/694) reported being ‘fairly’ or ‘somewhat’ confident with identifying frailty. Almost all respondents (>90%) recognised frailty as having an important impact on outcomes and believed that there are beneficial interventions for frailty. Commonly reported barriers to frailty assessment in practice included ‘lack of defined protocol for managing frailty’ and ‘lack of consensus about which frailty assessment tool to use’. Most respondents (88%, 521/595) were interested in receiving further education on frailty, with a high preference for online training.ConclusionsThe findings suggest frailty is important to health professionals in Australia, and there is a need for and interest in further frailty education.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Community and Home Care,General Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3