Frailty identification and management among Brazilian healthcare professionals: a survey
-
Published:2024-06-03
Issue:1
Volume:24
Page:
-
ISSN:1471-2318
-
Container-title:BMC Geriatrics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Geriatr
Author:
Azevedo Paula Schmidt,de Melo Ruth Caldeira,de Souza Juli Thomaz,Frost Rachael,Gavin James P.,Robinson Katie,Boas Paulo José Fortes Villas,Minicucci Marcos Ferreira,Aprahamian Ivan,Wachholz Patrick Alexander,Hinslif-Smith Kathryn,Gordon Adam Lee
Abstract
Abstract
Background
National and international guidelines on frailty assessment and management recommend frailty screening in older people. This study aimed to determine how Brazilian healthcare professionals (HCPs) identify and manage frailty in practice.
Methods
An anonymous online survey on the assessment and management of frailty was circulated virtually through HCPs across Brazil.
Results
Most of the respondants used non-specific criteria such as gait speed (45%), handgrip strength (37.6%), and comprehensive geriatric assessment (33.2%). The use of frailty-specific criteria was lower than 50%. The most frequently used criteria were the Frailty Index (19.1%), Frailty Phenotype (13.2%), and FRAIL (12.5%). Only 43.5% felt confident, and 40% had a plan to manage frailty. In the multivariate-adjusted models, training was the most crucial factor associated with assessing frailty, confidence, and having a management plan (p < 0.001 for all). Those with fewer years of experience were more likely to evaluate frailty (p = 0.009). Being a doctor increased the chance of using a specific tool; the opposite was true for dietitians (p = 0.03). Those who assisted more older people had a higher likelihood of having a plan (p = 0.011).
Conclusion
Frailty assessment was heterogeneous among healthcare professions groups, predominantly using non-specific criteria. Training contributed to frailty assessment, use of specific criteria, confidence, and having a management plan. This data informs the need for standardized screening criteria and management plans for frailty, in association with increasing training at the national level for all the HCPs who assist older people.
Funder
British Council Newton Fund Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Global Engagement Funds NIHR Applied Research Collaboration-East Midlands
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Dent E, Morley JE, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Woodhouse L, Rodríguez-Mañas L, Fried LP, Woo J, Aprahamian I, Sanford A, Lundy J, Landi F, Beilby J, Martin FC, Bauer JM, Ferrucci L, Merchant RA, Dong B, Arai H, Hoogendijk EO, Won CW, Abbatecola A, Cederholm T, Strandberg T, Gutiérrez Robledo LM, Flicker L, Bhasin S, Aubertin-Leheudre M, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Guralnik JM, Muscedere J, Pahor M, Ruiz J, Negm AM, Reginster JY, Waters DL, Vellas B. Physical Frailty: ICFSR International Clinical Practice guidelines for Identification and Management. J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(9):771–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-019-1273-z. PMID: 31641726; PMCID: PMC6800406. 2. Hoogendijk EO, Afilalo J, Ensrud KE, Kowal P, Onder G, Fried LP. Frailty: implications for clinical practice and public health. Lancet. 2019;394(10206):1365–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31786-6. PMID: 31609228. 3. Melo RC, Cipolli GC, Buarque GLA, Yassuda MS, Cesari M, Oude Voshaar RC, Aprahamian I. Prevalence of Frailty in Brazilian Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Nutr Health Aging. 2020; 24(7):708–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-020-1398-0. PMID: 32744566. 4. O’Caoimh R, Sezgin D, O’Donovan MR, Molloy DW, Clegg A, Rockwood K, Liew A. Prevalence of frailty in 62 countries across the world: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level studies. Age Ageing. 2021;50(1):96–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa219. PMID: 33068107. 5. Lourenço RA, Moreira VG, Mello RGB, Santos IS, Lin SM, Pinto ALF, et al. Brazilian consensus on frailty in older people: concepts, epidemiology and evaluation instruments. Geriatr Gerontol Aging. 2018;12:121–35. https://doi.org/10.5327/Z2447-211520181800023.
|
|