Frailty identification and management among Brazilian healthcare professionals: a survey

Author:

Azevedo Paula Schmidt,de Melo Ruth Caldeira,de Souza Juli Thomaz,Frost Rachael,Gavin James P.,Robinson Katie,Boas Paulo José Fortes Villas,Minicucci Marcos Ferreira,Aprahamian Ivan,Wachholz Patrick Alexander,Hinslif-Smith Kathryn,Gordon Adam Lee

Abstract

Abstract Background National and international guidelines on frailty assessment and management recommend frailty screening in older people. This study aimed to determine how Brazilian healthcare professionals (HCPs) identify and manage frailty in practice. Methods An anonymous online survey on the assessment and management of frailty was circulated virtually through HCPs across Brazil. Results Most of the respondants used non-specific criteria such as gait speed (45%), handgrip strength (37.6%), and comprehensive geriatric assessment (33.2%). The use of frailty-specific criteria was lower than 50%. The most frequently used criteria were the Frailty Index (19.1%), Frailty Phenotype (13.2%), and FRAIL (12.5%). Only 43.5% felt confident, and 40% had a plan to manage frailty. In the multivariate-adjusted models, training was the most crucial factor associated with assessing frailty, confidence, and having a management plan (p < 0.001 for all). Those with fewer years of experience were more likely to evaluate frailty (p = 0.009). Being a doctor increased the chance of using a specific tool; the opposite was true for dietitians (p = 0.03). Those who assisted more older people had a higher likelihood of having a plan (p = 0.011). Conclusion Frailty assessment was heterogeneous among healthcare professions groups, predominantly using non-specific criteria. Training contributed to frailty assessment, use of specific criteria, confidence, and having a management plan. This data informs the need for standardized screening criteria and management plans for frailty, in association with increasing training at the national level for all the HCPs who assist older people.

Funder

British Council Newton Fund

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

Global Engagement Funds

NIHR Applied Research Collaboration-East Midlands

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference24 articles.

1. Dent E, Morley JE, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Woodhouse L, Rodríguez-Mañas L, Fried LP, Woo J, Aprahamian I, Sanford A, Lundy J, Landi F, Beilby J, Martin FC, Bauer JM, Ferrucci L, Merchant RA, Dong B, Arai H, Hoogendijk EO, Won CW, Abbatecola A, Cederholm T, Strandberg T, Gutiérrez Robledo LM, Flicker L, Bhasin S, Aubertin-Leheudre M, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Guralnik JM, Muscedere J, Pahor M, Ruiz J, Negm AM, Reginster JY, Waters DL, Vellas B. Physical Frailty: ICFSR International Clinical Practice guidelines for Identification and Management. J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(9):771–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-019-1273-z. PMID: 31641726; PMCID: PMC6800406.

2. Hoogendijk EO, Afilalo J, Ensrud KE, Kowal P, Onder G, Fried LP. Frailty: implications for clinical practice and public health. Lancet. 2019;394(10206):1365–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31786-6. PMID: 31609228.

3. Melo RC, Cipolli GC, Buarque GLA, Yassuda MS, Cesari M, Oude Voshaar RC, Aprahamian I. Prevalence of Frailty in Brazilian Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Nutr Health Aging. 2020; 24(7):708–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-020-1398-0. PMID: 32744566.

4. O’Caoimh R, Sezgin D, O’Donovan MR, Molloy DW, Clegg A, Rockwood K, Liew A. Prevalence of frailty in 62 countries across the world: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level studies. Age Ageing. 2021;50(1):96–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa219. PMID: 33068107.

5. Lourenço RA, Moreira VG, Mello RGB, Santos IS, Lin SM, Pinto ALF, et al. Brazilian consensus on frailty in older people: concepts, epidemiology and evaluation instruments. Geriatr Gerontol Aging. 2018;12:121–35. https://doi.org/10.5327/Z2447-211520181800023.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3