Systemic Immune‐Inflammation Indices Could Be Additional Predictive Markers for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

Abstract

ABSTRACTProblemCesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is characterized by a gestational sac fully or partially implanted in the scar from a previous cesarean section. Systemic immune‐inflammation indices (SIIs) have recently been discussed as additional diagnostic markers in placenta accreta and preeclampsia. CSP shares a similar pathogenesis with these diseases, suggesting that assessing the SIIs and neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) could enhance additional predictability in diagnosing CSP.Method of StudyIn this study, we analyzed the complete blood counts between 264 women who were confirmed with CSP by ultrasound and 295 women who underwent elective termination.ResultsThe mean counts of total white cells and neutrophils were significantly higher, whereas the counts of monocytes, lymphocytes, and platelets were significantly lower in the CSP group compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Additionally, the SII, systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), or NLR was significantly higher in the CSP group compared to the control group (p < 0.0001). Given the limited effect of SII and SIRI on the increased risk of developing CSP, the optimal cut‐off value for NLR in predicting CSP was 2.87 (area under the curve [AUC] 0.656, 68% sensitivity). The optimal cut‐off value for NLR in predicting type 2 CSP was 2.91 (AUC 0.690, 71% sensitivity).ConclusionsAlthough ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging images are a gold standard for visualizing the gestational sac's location in the diagnosis of CSP, assessing peripheral blood tests is cost‐effective, and NLR may provide additional diagnosis value for CSP.