Potential risk factors for caesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study

Author:

Gull B1ORCID,Klerelid V1,Jormeus A2,Strandell A13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden

2. Department of Gynecology, Närhälsan Kungshöjd, Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

Abstract

Abstract STUDY QUESTION What are the important risk factors for having a caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP)? SUMMARY ANSWER Independent risk factors were smoking in the first trimester, higher parity, and previous caesarean section (CS) before the index caesarean delivery. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY A spectrum of risk factors for CSP has been suggested but not proven: parity, number of previous caesarean section, elective as opposed to emergency CS, IVF-pregnancy, breech presentation, previous gynaecological surgery as well as suture technique. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This retrospective case-control study included 31 women with a CSP during the period 2003–2018 treated at a tertiary care centre for gynaecology and reproduction. A control cohort of 8300 women with a history of a CS and a subsequent delivery during the same time period was formed. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Variables describing demography, lifestyle factors, and reproductive and obstetric history were retrieved from medical records and the obstetric hospital database. Logistic regression analyses were applied to identify potential risk factors. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In a multivariable analysis, smoking in first trimester (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.03, 95% CI 1.01–9.07), higher parity (adjusted OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.03–1.64) and previous CS in addition to the preceding CS (adjusted OR 3.43, 95% CI 1.35–8.66) were independently predictive of a CSP. An elective CS at the index pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of CSP but did not remain significant in the multivariable analysis. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION CSP is a very rare phenomenon and several of the risk factor estimates are imprecise. Nevertheless, significant risk factors could be identified. Another limitation is the lack of electronically recorded details on suture techniques. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The identified factors, namely higher parity and previous CS before the index caesarean section, are in accordance with previously suggested risk factors. Whether there is a true risk association between elective CS and future CSP needs to be investigated further. Smoking in the first trimester is a new finding, which has a plausible rationale. These factors should be recognised when counselling women after a caesarean delivery, particularly in a subsequent pregnancy with early complications. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This work was supported by a grant from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils the ALF-agreement (ALFGBG-720291). None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare.

Funder

Swedish state

Swedish government and the county councils the ALF-agreement

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Environmental Engineering

Reference27 articles.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3