Institutional Inertia and Change: Explaining the Czech and Portuguese Engagement in European Defence Market Integration

Author:

Weiss Tomáš1ORCID,Fernandes Sandra2,Pisklová Miroslava1

Affiliation:

1. Department of European Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences Charles University Prague

2. Department of Political Science and Research Centre in Political Science University of Minho Braga

Abstract

AbstractThe Permanent Structured Cooperation in Defence (PESCO) and the European Defence Fund (EDF) constitute another attempt to consolidate the European defence market. In this article, we explain the different engagements of Czechia and Portugal in the two initiatives until 2021 through the evolution and reform of the domestic institutions governing their defence industrial policies. We trace how the institutions were established, how they contributed to the national position on PESCO and EDF and how the two countries' defence industries became involved. The article shows how the different institutionalisation of the defence sector allowed Portugal and its companies to participate more than their Czech counterparts. We contribute to historical institutionalist scholarship by evidencing the critical role of ideas in promoting and preventing policy change. We also offer an insight into the practice of European defence co‐operation and identify processes that challenge further integration.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Economics and Econometrics,General Business, Management and Accounting,Business and International Management

Reference65 articles.

1. Agência Lusa(2019) ‘Jurista Marco Capitão Ferreira é o novo presidente da holding Empordef diz Ministro da Defesa’ Observador 29 April.

2. Offsets and Defense Procurement in the Czech Republic: A Case Study;Amara J.;European Security,2009

3. Small Countries and the Consolidation of the European Defence Industry: Portugal as a Case Study;Barros C.P.;Defence and Peace Economics,2002

4. Ideas and Social Policy: An Institutionalist Perspective

5. The New Ideas Scholarship in the Mirror of Historical Institutionalism: A Case of Old Whines in New Bottles?

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Small arms procurement and corruption in small NATO countries;Journal of Public Procurement;2024-07-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3