Affiliation:
1. School of Plant and Environmental Sciences Virginia Tech Blacksburg Virginia USA
2. Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory United States Department of Agriculture‐Agricultural Research Service Beltsville Maryland USA
3. Department of Food Science and Technology Virginia Tech Blacksburg Virginia USA
4. Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition US Food and Drug Administration College Park Maryland USA
Abstract
AbstractOutbreaks of Salmonellosis have been traced to contaminated tomato. The produce production environment poses a risk for Salmonella contamination; however, little is known about the effects of pest management practices on Salmonella during production. The study objective was to evaluate pesticide application on the inactivation of Salmonella on tomato leaves. Thirty greenhouse‐grown tomato plants were inoculated with S. enterica serovars Newport or Typhimurium. Inoculation was performed by dipping tomato leaves in an 8‐log CFU/mL Salmonella suspension with 0.025% (vol/vol) Silwet L‐77 surfactant for 30 s, for a starting concentration of 6–7 log CFU/mL. Plants were treated with one of four pesticides, each with a different mode of action [acibenzolar‐S‐methyl, copper‐hydroxide, peroxyacetic acid (PAA), and streptomycin]. Pesticides were applied at manufacturers' labeled rate for plant disease management with water as a control treatment. Salmonella was enumerated at 0.125 (3 h), 2, 6, and 9 days post‐inoculation (dpi), and counts log‐transformed. Growth of Salmonella was not observed. At 2 dpi, PAA and streptomycin significantly reduced surface Salmonella concentrations of inoculated tomato leaves (0.7 and 0.6‐log CFU/g, respectively; p ≤ 0.05), while significant Salmonella log reduction occurred in the ground tomato leaves after copper hydroxide treatment (0.8‐log CFU/g; p ≤ 0.05), compared to the control. No significant differences in Salmonella populations on tomato leaf surface and in ground leaves were observed from 2 to 9 dpi, regardless of pesticide application. These findings suggest single in‐field pesticide applications may not be an effective mitigation strategy in limiting potential Salmonella contamination. Future research, including multiple in‐field pesticide applications, or pesticide use in combination with other mitigation strategies, may offer intriguing management practices to limit possible preharvest contamination.
Funder
Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Food and Drug Administration
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Subject
Microbiology,Food Science,Parasitology