Biodiversity and elevation gradients: Insights on sampling biases across worldwide mountains

Author:

Costa Fernanda Vieira da12ORCID,Viana‐Júnior Arleu Barbosa34ORCID,Aguilar Ramiro56ORCID,Silveira Fernando A. O.2ORCID,Cornelissen Tatiana G.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas Universidade de Brasília Brasília Brazil

2. Center for Ecological Synthesis and Conservation Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte Brazil

3. Programa de Pós‐Graduação em Biodiversidade e Evolução, Laboratório de Ecologia de Invertebrados, Coordenação de Zoologia Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi Belém Brazil

4. Programa de Pós‐Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação da Universidade Estadual da Paraíba – UEPB Bairro Universitário Campina Grande Brazil

5. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal Universidad Nacional de Córdoba– CONICET Córdoba Argentina

6. Laboratorio Nacional de Análisis y Síntesis Ecológica (LANASE) Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Morelia Mexico

Abstract

AbstractAimIdentifying macroecological patterns and biases in species distribution is a challenging but essential task in biodiversity‐oriented studies. Despite extensive attempts to find consistent species richness elevation (SRE) patterns, the topic remains controversial owing to widespread conflicting, idiosyncratic and non‐generalizable underlying mechanisms. We used a meta‐analytical review to answer why patterns of species‐richness in elevation gradients remain elusive, a long‐standing, central but contentious macroecological and biogeographical question.LocationGlobal elevation gradients.TaxonMajor terrestrial taxa (invertebrates, vertebrates and plants).MethodsWe tested the effect of elevation on species richness using multilevel mixed‐effects meta‐analytical models. Data from 127 studies spawning almost one century of research were integrated to test the effect of elevation across distinct (1) SRE models, (2) quality of primary data (e.g. mountain sampling coverage), (3) biogeographic realms, (4) studied taxa and (5) organism mobility.ResultsThe linear negative pattern showed the strongest model fit followed by the hump‐shaped and the linear positive models. Studies with higher sampling sizes showed a consistent decrease in the strength of SRE patterns. Further, the larger the mountain coverage and sampled range, the stronger the detection of some SRE patterns. Overall, the elevational effect on species richness was consistent across biogeographical realms, taxonomic groups and organism mobility.Main ConclusionsThis study indicates a bias in the detection of SRE patterns, driven mostly by mountain comprehensiveness, namely the number of sampling units, sampled range and mountain sampling coverage. These results call attention to the evidence that undersampled elevation gradients may bias our understanding on the complex relationships between elevation and biodiversity, thus impairing a broad understanding on the ecology, evolution, biogeography and conservation of mountain biota.

Funder

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3