Affiliation:
1. Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas Universidade de Brasília Brasília Brazil
2. Center for Ecological Synthesis and Conservation Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte Brazil
3. Programa de Pós‐Graduação em Biodiversidade e Evolução, Laboratório de Ecologia de Invertebrados, Coordenação de Zoologia Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi Belém Brazil
4. Programa de Pós‐Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação da Universidade Estadual da Paraíba – UEPB Bairro Universitário Campina Grande Brazil
5. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal Universidad Nacional de Córdoba– CONICET Córdoba Argentina
6. Laboratorio Nacional de Análisis y Síntesis Ecológica (LANASE) Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Morelia Mexico
Abstract
AbstractAimIdentifying macroecological patterns and biases in species distribution is a challenging but essential task in biodiversity‐oriented studies. Despite extensive attempts to find consistent species richness elevation (SRE) patterns, the topic remains controversial owing to widespread conflicting, idiosyncratic and non‐generalizable underlying mechanisms. We used a meta‐analytical review to answer why patterns of species‐richness in elevation gradients remain elusive, a long‐standing, central but contentious macroecological and biogeographical question.LocationGlobal elevation gradients.TaxonMajor terrestrial taxa (invertebrates, vertebrates and plants).MethodsWe tested the effect of elevation on species richness using multilevel mixed‐effects meta‐analytical models. Data from 127 studies spawning almost one century of research were integrated to test the effect of elevation across distinct (1) SRE models, (2) quality of primary data (e.g. mountain sampling coverage), (3) biogeographic realms, (4) studied taxa and (5) organism mobility.ResultsThe linear negative pattern showed the strongest model fit followed by the hump‐shaped and the linear positive models. Studies with higher sampling sizes showed a consistent decrease in the strength of SRE patterns. Further, the larger the mountain coverage and sampled range, the stronger the detection of some SRE patterns. Overall, the elevational effect on species richness was consistent across biogeographical realms, taxonomic groups and organism mobility.Main ConclusionsThis study indicates a bias in the detection of SRE patterns, driven mostly by mountain comprehensiveness, namely the number of sampling units, sampled range and mountain sampling coverage. These results call attention to the evidence that undersampled elevation gradients may bias our understanding on the complex relationships between elevation and biodiversity, thus impairing a broad understanding on the ecology, evolution, biogeography and conservation of mountain biota.
Funder
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
Subject
Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献