Human in vivo baseline intrarenal pressure, peristaltic activity and response to ureteric stenting

Author:

Croghan Stefanie M.123ORCID,Cunnane Eoghan M.456ORCID,O’Meara Sorcha12ORCID,Cunnane Connor V.456ORCID,Forde James C.23,Manecksha Rustom P.78ORCID,Walsh Michael T.456,Breen Kieran J.910ORCID,McGuire Barry B.910,O’Brien Fergal J.11ORCID,Davis Niall F.23ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Royal College of Surgeons Ireland (Strategic Academic Recruitment [StAR] Programme) Dublin Ireland

2. Department of Urology Blackrock Clinic Dublin Ireland

3. Department of Urology Beaumont Hospital Dublin Ireland

4. School of Engineering University of Limerick Castletroy, Co. Limerick Ireland

5. Bernal Institute, University of Limerick Castletroy, Co. Limerick Ireland

6. Health Research Institute, University of Limerick Castletroy, Co. Limerick Ireland

7. Department of Urology Tallaght University Hospital Dublin Ireland

8. Department of Surgery Trinity College Dublin Dublin Ireland

9. Department of Urology St. Michael's Hospital Dublin Ireland

10. Department of Urology St. Vincent's University Hospital Dublin Ireland

11. Tissue Engineering Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Regenerative Medicine Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Dublin Ireland

Abstract

ObjectivesTo assess human in vivo intrarenal pressure (IRP) and peristaltic activity at baseline and after ureteric stent placement, using a narrow calibre pressure guidewire placed retrogradely in the renal pelvis.Patients and MethodsA prospective, multi‐institutional study recruiting consenting patients undergoing ureteroscopy was designed with ethical approval. Prior to ureteroscopy, the urinary bladder was emptied and the COMET™ II pressure guidewire (Boston Scientific) was advanced retrogradely via the ureteric orifice to the renal pelvis. Baseline IRPs were recorded for 1–2 min. At procedure completion, following ureteric stent insertion, IRPs were recorded for another 1–2 min. Statistical analysis of mean baseline IRP, peristaltic waveforms and frequency of peristaltic contractions was performed, thereby analysing the influence of patient variables and ureteric stenting.ResultsA total of 100 patients were included. Baseline mean (±SD) IRP was 16.76 (6.4) mmHg in the renal pelvis, with maximum peristaltic IRP peaks reaching a mean (SD) of 25.75 (17.9) mmHg. Peristaltic activity generally occurred in a rhythmic, coordinated fashion, with a mean (SD) interval of 5.63 (3.08) s between peaks. On univariate analysis, higher baseline IRP was observed with male sex, preoperative hydronephrosis, and preoperative ureteric stenting. On linear regression, male sex was no longer statistically significant, whilst the latter two variables remained significant (P = 0.004; P < 0.001). The mean (SD) baseline IRP in the non‐hydronephrotic, unstented cohort was 14.19 (4.39) mmHg. Age, α‐blockers and calcium channel blockers did not significantly influence IRP, and no measured variables influenced peristaltic activity. Immediately after ureteric stent insertion, IRP decreased (mean [SD] 15.18 [5.28] vs 16.76 [6.4] mmHg, P = 0.004), whilst peristaltic activity was maintained.ConclusionsHuman in vivo mean (SD) baseline IRP is 14.19 (4.39) mmHg in normal kidneys and increases with both hydronephrosis and preoperative ureteric stenting. Mean (SD) peristaltic peak IRP values of 25.75 (17.9) mmHg are reached in the renal pelvis every 3–7 s and maintained in the early post‐stent period.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3