Optimal dose of adrenaline auto‐injector for children and young people at risk of anaphylaxis: A phase IV randomized controlled crossover study

Author:

Patel Nandinee1,Isaacs Emily1,Duca Bettina1,Nagaratnam Nanthagopan2,Donovan Jackie2,Fontanella Sara1,Turner Paul J.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. National Heart & Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK

2. Department of Clinical Biochemistry Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust London UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundGuidelines recommend intramuscular injection of 500 μg adrenaline (epinephrine) for anaphylaxis in teenagers and adults; however, most autoinjectors deliver a maximum 300 μg dose. We evaluated plasma adrenaline levels and cardiovascular parameters (including cardiac output) following self‐injection with 300 μg or 500 μg adrenaline in teenagers at risk of anaphylaxis.MethodsSubjects were recruited to a randomized, single‐blind two period crossover trial. Participants received all 3 injections (Emerade® 500 μg, Emerade® 300 μg, Epipen® 0.3 mg) on 2 separate visits (allocated in a randomized block design), at least 28 days apart. Intramuscular injection was confirmed by ultrasound, and heart rate/stroke volume assessed using continuous monitoring. The trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03366298).ResultsTwelve participants (58% male, median 15.4 years) participated; all completed the study. 500 μg injection resulted in a higher and more prolonged peak concentration (p = 0.01) and greater Area‐Under‐Curve for plasma adrenaline (p < 0.05) compared to 300 μg, with no difference in adverse events. Adrenaline caused a significant increase in heart rate irrespective of dose and device. Unexpectedly, 300 μg adrenaline resulted in a significant increase in stroke volume when delivered with Emerade®, but a negative inotropic effect with Epipen® (p < 0.05).ConclusionsThese data support a 500 μg dose of adrenaline to treat anaphylaxis in individuals >40 kg in the community. The contrasting effects on stroke volume between Epipen® and Emerade®, despite similar peak plasma adrenaline levels, are unexpected. There is an urgent need to better understand differences in pharmacodynamics following adrenaline administration by autoinjector. In the meantime, we recommend adrenaline injection by needle/syringe in the healthcare setting in individuals with anaphylaxis refractory to initial treatment.

Funder

Medical Research Council

NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Immunology,Immunology and Allergy

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A review and outlook on expression of animal proteins in plants;Frontiers in Plant Science;2024-08-22

2. Evidence-based use of epinephrine in anaphylaxis;Current Opinion in Allergy & Clinical Immunology;2024-07-29

3. The Immunobiology and Treatment of Food Allergy;Annual Review of Immunology;2024-06-28

4. Real-world safety experience with Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Allergen Powder-dnfp in 2500 children with peanut allergy;Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology;2024-06

5. Decoding food reactions: a detailed exploration of food allergies vs. intolerances and sensitivities;Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition;2024-05-15

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3