Affiliation:
1. Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation & Governance Tallinn University of Technology Tallinn Estonia
2. School of Public Affairs and Administration University of Kansas Lawrence Kansas USA
3. Department of Political Science & Public Administration University of North Carolina at Charlotte Charlotte North Carolina USA
Abstract
AbstractA key question of public sector innovation (PSI) scholarship is: which factors influence innovation? This paper focuses on managerial practices as drivers of PSI and addresses two research questions. First, how have the main types of managerial reforms—pertaining to marketization, results‐orientation, and collaboration—influenced PSI? Second, how have different features of public sector reform strategies influenced PSI? Using survey data from 19 European countries, we show that reforms focusing on collaboration and results‐orientation facilitate PSI, while marketization‐type reforms have no significant impact. Our study indicates that reforms initiated by public administration (rather than politicians) are more conducive to PSI. We also show that reforms that are crisis‐driven and reforms oriented toward cost cutting have negative impacts on PSI. Overall, our findings demonstrate that New Public Governance‐type reforms exert more positive influence on PSI than NPM‐type reforms.
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献