Affiliation:
1. Romney Institute of Public Management Brigham Young University Provo Utah USA
Abstract
AbstractPublic service motivation (PSM), public service values (PSV), and public service ethos (PSE), we argue, constitute theoretically complementary dimensions of public service psychology. Using multi‐dimensional scaling (MDS), we also empirically map the three constructs to identify their interrelationships as constituent parts of a public service topology. Using a survey of public and private employees, we determined which of the PSM, PSV, and PSE instruments most strongly correlate with (1) sector of employment, (2) preferences in public service decision vignettes, and (3) prosocial citizenship behavior. We find PSM, PSV, and PSE to be distinctly complementary, rather than competing psychological phenomena. Incorporating—theoretically and empirically—the three approaches into one topology suggests dimensions of an integrated public service psychology comprising two axes that vary on an advocacy–neutrality scale and a self‐focused–other‐focused scale. With this topographical orientation, public administration scholars can better select the appropriate instrument(s), whether PSM, PSV, or PSE, for the public service situation/question.
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference88 articles.
1. Co-Production, Interdependence and Publicness: Extending public service-dominant logic
2. Does Public Service Motivation Affect the Behavior of Professionals?
3. The ‘Publicness’ of Public Organizations
4. The “publicness puzzle” in organization theory: a test of alternative explanations of differences between public and private organizations;Bozeman B.;Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,1994
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献