Extracorporeal life support in mitral papillary muscle rupture: Outcome of multicenter study

Author:

Massimi Giulio12ORCID,Matteucci Matteo13,De Bonis Michele4,Kowalewski Mariusz15,Formica Francesco67ORCID,Russo Claudio Francesco8,Sponga Sandro9,Vendramin Igor9,Colli Andrea10,Falcetta Giosuè10,Trumello Cinzia4,Carrozzini Massimiliano8ORCID,Fischlein Theodor11,Troise Giovanni12,Actis Dato Guglielmo13ORCID,D'Alessandro Stefano6,Nia Peyman Sardari1,Lodo Vittoria13,Villa Emmanuel12ORCID,Shah Shabir Hussain14,Scrofani Roberto15,Binaco Irene15,Kalisnik Jurij Matija11,Pettinari Matteo16,Thielmann Matthias17,Meyns Bart18,Khouqeer Fareed A.19,Fino Carlo20,Simon Caterina20,Severgnini Paolo3,Kowalowka Adam21ORCID,Deja Marek A.21,Ronco Daniele3ORCID,Lorusso Roberto122

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Vascular Centre Maastricht University Medical Centre Maastricht The Netherlands

2. Department of Cardiac Surgery Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital Perugia Italy

3. Department Biotechnology and Life Sciences Insubria University‐ Cardiac Anaesthesia and Intensive Care ASST Sette Laghi Circolo Hospital Varese Italy

4. Cardiothoracic Surgery Department San Raffaele University Hospital Milan Italy

5. Thoracic Research Centre, Collegium Medicum Nicolaus Copernicus University, Innovative Medical Forum Bydgoszcz Poland

6. Department of Medicine and Surgery, Cardiac Surgery Clinic San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano‐Bicocca Monza Italy

7. Department of Medicine and Surgery University of Parma Italy

8. Cardiac Surgery Unit, Cardio‐Thoraco‐Vascular Department Niguarda Hospital Milan Italy

9. Cardiothoracic Department University Hospital of Udine Udine Italy

10. Section of Cardiac Surgery University Hospital Pisa Italy

11. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiovascular Center, Klinikum Nürnberg Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg Germany

12. Cardiac Surgery Unit Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital Brescia Italy

13. Cardiac Surgery Department Mauriziano Hospital Turin Italy

14. Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery Department King Fahad Medical City Riyadh Saudi Arabia

15. Cardiac Surgery Unit Policlinico Milano Hospital Milan Italy

16. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Ziekenhuis Oost‐Limburg Genk Belgium

17. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, West‐German Heart Center University of Duisburg‐Essen Essen Germany

18. Department of Cardiac Surgery University Hospitals Leuven Leuven Belgium

19. Department of Cardiac Surgery King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center Riyadh Saudi Arabia

20. Cardiovascular Department Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital Bergamo Italy

21. Department of Cardiac Surgery Medical University of Silesia Katowice Poland

22. Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht Maastricht The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPost‐acute myocardial infarction papillary muscle rupture (post‐AMI PMR) may present variable clinical scenarios and degree of emergency due to result of cardiogenic shock. Veno‐arterial extracorporeal life support (V‐A ECLS) has been proposed to improve extremely poor pre‐ or postoperative conditions. Information in this respect is scarce.MethodsFrom the CAUTION (meChanical complicAtion of acUte myocardial infarcTion: an InternatiOnal multiceNter cohort study) database (16 different Centers, data from 2001 to 2018), we extracted adult patients who were surgically treated for post‐AMI PMR and underwent pre‐ or/and postoperative V‐A ECLS support. The end‐points of this study were in‐hospital survival and ECLS complications.ResultsFrom a total of 214 post‐AMI PMR patients submitted to surgery, V‐A ECLS was instituted in 23 (11%) patients. The median age was 61.7 years (range 46–81 years). Preoperatively, ECLS was commenced in 10 patients (43.5%), whereas intra/postoperative in the remaining 13. The most common V‐A ECLS indication was post‐cardiotomy shock, followed by preoperative cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest. The median duration of V‐A ECLS was 4 days. V‐A ECLS complications occurred in more than half of the patients. Overall, in‐hospital mortality was 39.2% (9/23), compared to 22% (42/219) for the non‐ECLS group.ConclusionsIn post‐AMI PMR patients, V‐A ECLS was used in almost 10% of the patients either to promote bridge to surgery or as postoperative support. Further investigations are required to better evaluate a potential for increased use and its effects of V‐A ECLS in such a context based on the still high perioperative mortality.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Biomedical Engineering,General Medicine,Biomaterials,Medicine (miscellaneous),Bioengineering

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3