Vaccination for the prevention of equine herpesvirus‐1 disease in domesticated horses: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Osterrieder Klaus1ORCID,Dorman David C.2ORCID,Burgess Brandy A.3ORCID,Goehring Lutz S.4,Gross Peggy2ORCID,Neinast Claire2,Pusterla Nicola5,Hussey Gisela Soboll6,Lunn David P.7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institut für Virologie Freie Universität Berlin Berlin Germany

2. College of Veterinary Medicine North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA

3. College of Veterinary Medicine University of Georgia Athens Georgia USA

4. College of Agriculture, Food and Environment University of Kentucky, Maxwell H. Gluck Equine Research Center Lexington Kentucky USA

5. School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis California USA

6. College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, Veterinary Medical Center East Lansing Michigan USA

7. School of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool Liverpool UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundEquine herpes virus type 1 (EHV‐1) infection in horses is associated with respiratory and neurologic disease, abortion, and neonatal death.HypothesisVaccines decrease the occurrence of clinical disease in EHV‐1‐infected horses.MethodsA systematic review was performed searching multiple databases to identify relevant studies. Selection criteria were original peer‐reviewed research reports that investigated the in vivo use of vaccines for the prevention of disease caused by EHV‐1 in domesticated horses. Main outcomes of interest included pyrexia, abortion, neurologic disease, viremia, and nasal shedding. We evaluated risk of bias, conducted exploratory meta‐analyses of incidence data for the main outcomes, and performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for each vaccine subtype.ResultsA total of 1018 unique studies were identified, of which 35 met the inclusion criteria. Experimental studies accounted for 31/35 studies, with the remainder being observational studies. Eight vaccine subclasses were identified including commercial (modified‐live, inactivated, mixed) and experimental (modified‐live, inactivated, deletion mutant, DNA, recombinant). Risk of bias was generally moderate, often because of underreporting of research methods, and sample sizes were small leading to imprecision in the estimate of the effect size. Several studies reported either no benefit or minimal vaccine efficacy for the primary outcomes of interest. Meta‐analyses revealed significant heterogeneity was present, and our confidence in the quality of evidence for most outcomes was low to moderate.Conclusions and Clinical ImportanceOur review indicates that commercial and experimental vaccines minimally reduce the incidence of clinical disease associated with EHV‐1 infection.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Veterinary

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3