Pharmacologic interventions for the treatment of equine herpesvirus‐1 in domesticated horses: A systematic review

Author:

Goehring Lutz1ORCID,Dorman David C.2ORCID,Osterrieder Klaus3ORCID,Burgess Brandy A.4ORCID,Dougherty Kelsie2,Gross Peggy2ORCID,Neinast Claire2,Pusterla Nicola5,Soboll‐Hussey Gisela6ORCID,Lunn David P.7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Kentucky, College of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Maxwell H. Gluck Equine Research Center, 1400 Nicholasville Road Lexington, Kentucky 40546‐0099 USA

2. College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Drive Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 USA

3. Institut für Virologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Robert‐von‐Ostertag‐Str. 7 14163 Berlin Germany

4. College of Veterinary Medicine University of Georgia, 2200 College Station Road Athens, Georgia 30602 USA

5. School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, One Garrod Drive Davis, California 95616 USA

6. College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, Veterinary Medical Center, Room G331, 784 Wilson Road East Lansing, Michigan 48824 USA

7. School of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road Neston CH64 7TE United Kingdom

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundEquine herpes virus type 1 (EHV‐1) infection in horses is associated with upper respiratory disease, neurological disease, abortions, and neonatal death.Review QuestionDoes pharmacological therapy decrease either the incidence or severity of disease or infection caused by EHV‐1 in domesticated horses?MethodsA systematic review was preformed searching AGRICOLA, CAB Abstracts, Cochrane, PubMed, Web of Science, and WHO Global Health Index Medicus Regional Databases to identify articles published before February 15, 2021. Selection criteria were original research reports published in peer reviewed journals, and studies investigating in vivo use of therapeutic agents for prevention or treatment of EHV‐1 in horses. Outcomes assessed included measures related to clinical outcomes that reflect symptomatic EHV‐1 infection or virus infection. We evaluated risk of bias and performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.ResultsA total of 7009 unique studies were identified, of which 9 met the inclusion criteria. Two studies evaluated valacyclovir or small interfering RNAs, and single studies evaluated the use of a Parapoxvirus ovis‐based immunomodulator, human alpha interferon, an herbal supplement, a cytosine analog, and heparin. The level of evidence ranged between randomized controlled studies and observational trials. The risk of bias was moderate to high and sample sizes were small. Most studies reported either no benefit or minimal efficacy of the intervention tested.Conclusions and Clinical ImportanceOur review indicates minimal or limited benefit either as a prophylactic or post‐exposure treatment for any of the studied interventions in the mitigation of EHV‐1‐associated disease outcome.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3