Biological control of weeds in Australia: the last 120 years

Author:

Cullen J. M.1ORCID,Palmer W. A.2,Sheppard A. W.1

Affiliation:

1. Health and Biosecurity CSIRO Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia

2. Biosecurity Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Ecosciences Precinct Dutton Park Queensland Australia

Abstract

AbstractThe development of the field of biological control of weeds in Australia is described, from the first attempts in 1903 to the present day. The interest sparked by the obvious success of prickly pear program, apparent from 1930 to 1935, resulted in several programs during the next 20 years, followed by a decline in activity until the 1970s when activity increased enormously following the success of the skeleton weed program and the effective use of a plant pathogen for the first time. This momentum was maintained until the beginning of the present century with several successes and was marked by several important advances in genetic profiling, host‐specificity testing, economic evaluation, conflict of interest resolution and the ecology of insect/plant interactions, including evaluation of the effectiveness of individual introductions. Biological control has proved to be a valuable and effective approach to weed management in Australia with 39% of all programs considered to produce complete or near‐complete control, 30.5% partial control and an average benefit–cost ratio of 23:1. Funding for research has been variable with a decline from the late 1990s but with a significant increase again since 2020.

Funder

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Queensland Government

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Insect Science,Agronomy and Crop Science,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference146 articles.

1. Barbetta M.(2018)Classical weed biological control outcomes: a catalogue‐based analysis of success rates and their correlates. Final Capstone Submission for FOR3008H. Available from:https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/87383

2. How good are we at predicting the field host-range of fungal pathogens used for classical biological control of weeds?

3. Current status ofAgrilus hyperici(Coleoptera: Buprestidae) released in Australia in 1940 for the control of St John's wort: Lessons for insect introductions

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3