Separating the wheat from the chaff: How to measure hospital quality in routine data?

Author:

Bilger Jana1,Pletscher Mark1,Müller Tobias1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health, Institute of Health Economics & Policy Bern University of Applied Sciences Bern Switzerland

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo measure hospital quality based on routine data available in many health care systems including the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, Scandinavia, and Switzerland.Data Sources and Study SettingWe use the Swiss Medical Statistics of Hospitals, an administrative hospital dataset of all inpatient stays in acute care hospitals in Switzerland for the years 2017–2019.Study DesignWe study hospital quality based on quality indicators used by leading agencies in five countries (the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Austria, and Switzerland) for two high‐volume elective procedures: inguinal hernia repair and hip replacement surgery. We assess how least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), a supervised machine learning technique for variable selection, and Mundlak corrections that account for unobserved heterogeneity between hospitals can be used to improve risk adjustment and correct for imbalances in patient risks across hospitals.Data Collection/Extraction MethodsThe Swiss Federal Statistical Office collects annual data on all acute care inpatient stays including basic socio‐demographic patient attributes and case‐level diagnosis and procedure codes.Principal FindingsWe find that LASSO‐selected and Mundlak‐corrected hospital random effects logit models outperform common practice logistic regression models used for risk adjustment. Besides the more favorable statistical properties, they have superior in‐ and out‐of‐sample explanatory power. Moreover, we find that Mundlak‐corrected logits and the more complex LASSO‐selected models identify the same hospitals as high or low‐quality offering public health authorities a valuable alternative to standard logistic regression models. Our analysis shows that hospitals vary considerably in the quality they provide to patients.ConclusionWe find that routine hospital data can be used to measure clinically relevant quality indicators that help patients make informed hospital choices.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health Policy

Reference64 articles.

1. Preconditions for efficiency and affordability in competitive healthcare markets: are they fulfilled in Belgium, Germany, Israel, the Netherlands and Switzerland?;Ven WPMM;Health Policy,2013

2. The History and Principles of Managed Competition

3. Managed Competition: An Agenda for Action

4. Health Care Exceptionalism? Performance and Allocation in the US Health Care Sector

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3