Systemic failures in nursing home care—A scoping study

Author:

Sturmberg Joachim P.12ORCID,Gainsford Len34,Goodwin Nicholas5ORCID,Pond Dimity6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing University of Newcastle Newcastle New South Wales Australia

2. International Society for Systems and Complexity Sciences for Health Australia

3. Australian Government Tertiary Education Quality & Standards Agency Audit & Risk Committee & Chair Transport Safety Victoria Audit Committee Australia

4. Centre for Enterprise Performance Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne Victoria Australia

5. Central Coast Research Institute for Integrated Care University of Newcastle and the Central Coast Local Health District Newcastle New South Wales Australia

6. Wicking Dementia Research and Training Centre University of Tasmania Hobart Tasmania Australia

Abstract

AbstractNursing homes (also referred to as residential aged care facilities, or long‐term care facilities) cater for older people on a respite or long‐term basis for those who are no longer able to live independently at home. Globally the sector struggles to meet societal expectations since it is torn between three competing agendas—meeting the needs of residents, meeting the demands of regulators, and meeting the financial imperatives of nursing home proprietors. Competing demands indicate that the system lacks a clear understanding of its purpose—without a clearly understood purpose any system will become dysfunctional overall and across all its levels of organisation. This scoping study aims to summarise and synthesise what is already known about the systemic function and failures in the nursing home system, and the impact this has on the wider health and aged care system.MethodMEDLINE, EMBASE, PSYCHINFO, CINAHL and SCOPUS were searched using the terms: (nursing home care OR residential aged care OR nursing home) AND (organisational failure OR institutional failure OR systemic failure), limited to English language articles, including all years up to the end of February 2021. In addition, we used snowballing of article references and Google searches of the grey literature. System‐focused articles were defined as those that explored how an issue at one system level impacted other system levels, or how an issue impacted at least two different agents at the same system level.ResultThirty‐eight articles addressed systemic issues as defined in four different contexts: United States (14), Canada (2), Australia (11) and European countries (11). Only four studies reported whole‐of‐system findings, whereas the remaining 34 more narrowly addressed systemic features of specific nursing home issues. The thematic analysis identified 29 key systemic issues across five system layers which consistently appear across every country/health system context. The negative outcomes of these systemic failings include: high rates of regulatory reprimands for unacceptable or unsafe practices; dissatisfaction in care experiences on the part of residents, families, and care staff—including a fear of being sent to a nursing home; and the perception amongst staff that nursing homes are not preferred places to work.ConclusionsThe key issues affecting nursing home residents, and the care home sector more generally, are systemic in nature arising from two key issues: first, the lack of shared agreement on the care home system's purpose; and second, the lack of clear governance and accountability frameworks for system regulation and performance at a national level. Addressing these two key issues must be the starting point for any ‘real’ nursing home system redesign that can achieve a seamlessly integrated system that delivers the outcomes nursing home residents and their families expect. ‘Systems thinking’ is required to simultaneously improve care quality and outcomes for residents, strengthen regulation and accountability, and enable financial viability.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference74 articles.

1. Improving Elder Care in Nursing Homes: Government of the Netherland. https://www.government.nl/topics/nursing-homes-and-residential-care/improving-elder-care-in-nursing-homes

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3