Evaluation of microembolic signals on carotid ultrasound during pulmonary vein isolation with high‐power short‐duration and cryoballoon ablations: When and where do bubble and solid emboli arise?

Author:

Mizutani Yoshiaki12ORCID,Yanagisawa Satoshi2ORCID,Ichikawa Mizuki3,Nishio Keisuke1,Sakai Hiroya1,Nonokawa Daishi1,Makino Yuichiro1,Suzuki Hitomi1,Ichimiya Hitoshi1,Uchida Yasuhiro1,Watanabe Junji1,Kanashiro Masaaki1,Inden Yasuya2ORCID,Murohara Toyoaki2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology Yokkaichi Municipal Hospital Yokkaichi Mie Japan

2. Department of Cardiology Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Nagoya Aichi Japan

3. Department of Clinical Laboratory Yokkaichi Municipal Hospital Yokkaichi Mie Japan

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionThe underlying risks of asymptomatic embolization during high‐power short‐duration (HPSD) ablation for atrial fibrillation remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate microembolic signals (MESs) during HPSD ablation with power settings of 50 and 90 W in comparison with those during cryoballoon (CB) ablation using a novel carotid ultrasound‐Doppler system that classifies solid and air bubble signals using real‐time monitoring.Methods and ResultsForty‐seven patients underwent HPSD ablation using radiofrequency (RF), and 13 underwent CB ablation. MESs were evaluated using a novel pastable soft ultrasound probe equipped with a carotid ultrasound during pulmonary vein isolation. We compared the detailed MESs and their timing between RF and CB ablations. The number of MESs and solid signals were significantly higher in the RF group than in CB group (209 ± 229 vs. 79 ± 32, p = .047, and 83 ± 89 vs. 28 ± 17, p = .032, respectively). In RF ablation, the number of MESs, solid, and bubble signals per ablation point, or per second, was significantly higher at 90 W than at 50 W ablation. The MESs, solid, and bubble signals were detected more frequently in the bottom and anterior walls of the left pulmonary vein (LPV) ablation. In contrast, many MESs were observed before the first CB application and decreased chronologically as the procedure progressed. Signals were more prevalent during the CB interval rather than during the freezing time. Among the 28 patients, 4 exhibited a high‐intensity area on postbrain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The MRI‐positive group showed a trend of larger signal sizes than did the MRI‐negative group.ConclusionThe number of MESs was higher in the HPSD RF group than in the CB group, with this risk being more pronounced in the 90 W ablation group. The primary detection site was the anterior wall of the LPV in RF and the first interval in CB ablation.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3