From Detractors to Promoters: A comparative analysis of patient experience drivers across Net Promoter Score subcategories

Author:

Adams Corey1ORCID,Harrison Reema1ORCID,Iqbal Maha Pervaz1ORCID,Schembri Anthony2ORCID,Walpola Ramesh3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Australian Institute of Health Innovation (AIHI) Macquarie University Sydney Australia

2. St Vincent's Health Network Sydney Australia

3. School of Health Sciences University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe utilization of patient experience surveying by health care institutions has become increasingly prevalent, yet its effectiveness in promoting quality improvement remains uncertain. To enhance the utility of patient feedback, the examination of free‐text comments may provide valuable insights to guide patient experience strategy.AimsThis study aims to explore the utility of free‐text comments and identify key differences for patient experience drivers between Net Promoter Score (NPS) subcategories of Detractors, Passives, and Promoters.MethodsEvaluation and classification of comments was conducted using the eight Picker Principles of Person Centred Care, with descriptive analysis of patient comments performed on the NPS data.ResultsAnalysis of patient NPS comments can be classified into three key drivers: “feeling well‐treated” (for Detractors), “feeling comfortable” (for Passives), and “feeling valued” (for Promoters). Specifically, Detractor comments provided the most comprehensive and detailed feedback to guide patient experience improvement activities.ConclusionThis study highlights differences between NPS subcategories, particularly regarding aspects of safety, comfort, and feeling valued. Comments from Detractor respondents may be especially useful for guiding quality improvements due to increased specificity and insights. These results also emphasize the essential nature of empathy and compassionate interactions between patients and clinicians to achieve the highest level of patient satisfaction and experience.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3