Estimating vigilance from the pre‐work shift sleep using an under‐mattress sleep sensor

Author:

Manners Jack12ORCID,Kemps Eva2,Guyett Alisha13,Stuart Nicole12,Lechat Bastien1ORCID,Catcheside Peter1,Scott Hannah1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute: Sleep Health, Flinders University Adelaide Australia

2. College of Education, Psychology, and Social Work Flinders University Adelaide Australia

3. College of Medicine and Public Health Flinders University Adelaide Australia

Abstract

SummaryPredicting vigilance impairment in high‐risk shift work occupations is critical to help to reduce workplace errors and accidents. Current methods rely on multi‐night, often manually entered, sleep data. This study developed a machine learning model for predicting vigilance errors based on a single prior sleep period, derived from an under‐mattress sensor. Twenty‐four healthy volunteers (mean [SD] age = 27.6 [9.5] years, 12 male) attended the laboratory on two separate occasions, 1 month apart, to compare wake performance and sleep under two different lighting conditions. Each condition occurred over an 8 day protocol comprising a baseline sleep opportunity from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m., a 27 h wake period, then daytime sleep opportunities from 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. on days 3–7. From 12 a.m. to 8 a.m. on each of days 4–7, participants completed simulated night shifts that included six 10 min psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) trials per shift. Sleep was assessed using an under‐mattress sensor. Using extra‐trees machine learning models, PVT performance (reaction times <500 ms, reaction, and lapses) during each night shift was predicted based on the preceding daytime sleep. The final extra‐trees model demonstrated moderate accuracy for predicting PVT performance, with standard errors (RMSE) of 19.9 ms (reaction time, 359 [41.6]ms), 0.42 reactions/s (reaction speed, 2.5 [0.6] reactions/s), and 7.2 (lapses, 10.5 [12.3]). The model also correctly classified 84% of trials containing ≥5 lapses (Matthews correlation coefficient = 0.59, F1 = 0.83). Model performance is comparable to current fatigue prediction models that rely upon self‐report or manually entered data. This efficient approach may help to manage fatigue and safety in non‐standard work schedules.

Funder

Flinders University

Defence Science and Technology Group

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Cognitive Neuroscience,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3