Performance evaluation of an under-mattress sleep sensor versus polysomnography in400 nights with healthy and unhealthy sleep

Author:

Manners JackORCID,Kemps EvaORCID,Lechat BastienORCID,Catcheside PeterORCID,Eckert DannyORCID,Scott HannahORCID

Abstract

AbstractConsumer sleep trackers can provide useful insight into sleep and sleep patterns. However, large scale performance evaluation studies against direct sleep measures are needed to comprehensively understand sleep tracker accuracy. This study evaluated performance of an under-mattress sensor to estimate sleep and wake versus polysomnography, during multiple in-laboratory protocols in a large sample including individuals with and without sleep disorders and during day versus night sleep opportunities.183 participants (51% male, mean[SD] age=45[18] years) attended the sleep laboratory for a research study that included simultaneous polysomnography and under-mattress sensor (Withings Sleep Analyzer [WSA]) recordings. Epoch-by-epoch analyses with confusion matrices were used to determine accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the WSA versus polysomnography. Bland-Altman plots examined bias in sleep duration, efficiency, onset-latency, and wake after sleep onset.Overall WSA sleep-wake classification accuracy was 83%, sensitivity 95%, and specificity 37%. The WSA significantly overestimated total sleep time (48[81]minutes), Sleep efficiency (9[15]%), sleep onset latency (6[26]), and underestimated wake after sleep onset (54[78]), p<0.05. Accuracy and specificity were higher for night versus daytime sleep opportunities in healthy individuals (89% and 47% versus 82% and 26% respectively, p<0.05). Accuracy and sensitivity were also higher for healthy individuals (89% and 97%) versus those with sleep disorders (81% and 91%, p<0.05).WSA performance is comparable to other consumer sleep trackers, with high sensitivity but poor specificity compared to polysomnography. Poorer accuracy and specificity during daytime versus night-time sleep opportunities is likely due to increased wake time and reduced sleep efficiency. Contactless, under-mattress sleep sensors show promise for accurate sleep monitoring, noting the tendency to over-estimate sleep particularly where wake time is high.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3