Abstract
Does birth make a difference to the moral rights of the fetus /infant? Should it make a difference to its legal rights? Most contemporary philosophers believe that birth cannot make a difference to moral rights. If this is true, then it becomes difficult to justify either a moral or a legal distinction between late abortion and infanticide. I argue that the view that birth is irrelevant to moral rights rests upon two highly questionable assumptions about the theoretical foundations of moral rights. If we reject these assumptions, then we are free to take account of the contrasting biological and social relationships that make even relatively late abortion morally different from infanticide.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Philosophy,Gender Studies
Reference23 articles.
1. Forced cesareans: The most unkindest cut;Annas;Hastings Center Report,1982
Cited by
42 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Abortion, Infanticide, and Choosing Parenthood;Dialogue;2024-02-19
2. Una clasificación de las teorías éticas sobre el aborto;Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica;2023-11-23
3. Theories of consciousness and a life worth living;Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences;2023-10
4. Being-from-Birth;European journal of analytic philosophy;2023-03-17
5. Abortion;Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy;2023