Gamebrics: Design, implementation and practical evaluation of analytical rubrics in serious game play

Author:

Hummel Hans G. K.1ORCID,Nadolski Rob1ORCID,Huurdeman Hugo1ORCID,van Lankveld Giel1ORCID,Georgiadis Konstantinos1ORCID,Slootmaker Aad2ORCID,Kurvers Hub2,Hummel Mick2,Neessen Petra3ORCID,van den Boomen Johan3,Pat‐El Ron4ORCID,Fischmann Julia4

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Educational Sciences Open University Heerlen The Netherlands

2. Expertise Centre Education Open University Heerlen The Netherlands

3. Faculty of Management Open University Heerlen The Netherlands

4. Faculty of Psychology Open University Heerlen The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundComplex skills, like analytical thinking, are essential in preparing students for future professions. Serious games hold potential to stimulate the online acquisition of such professional skills in an active and experiential way.ObjectiveRubrics are proven assessment and evaluation instruments, but were never directly integrated into actual gameplay. We present our approach towards the integration of analytical rubrics into gameplay, the implementation into existing (scenario‐based) serious games, and main findings from a study on learning effects and appreciation of the tooling (dashboard with progress information and reflective feedback).MethodOur experimental research setup randomly allocated 84 participating students into either a control group or an experimental group. The intervention for the control group consisted of an existing serious game with natural feedback as part of the scenario, supporting the gameplay itself. The intervention for the experimental group also provided an additional dashboard with reflective feedback, monitoring the acquisition of analytical skills through gameplay. Learning growth through gameplay was measured by pre‐/post‐test scores on a knowledge test, in‐game performance by means of computer logging, and appreciation of the dashboard and feedback by means of a questionnaire.Results and ConclusionsParticipants receiving reflective feedback show higher learning increases (on a pre‐/post‐knowledge test), and more efficient gameplay behaviour (on performance scores). Participants receiving reflective feedback feel more confident about competence development. These findings appear promising for this approach on integrating formative assessment in serious gameplay to support the acquisition of complex skills.

Funder

Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3