Reference frames for learning analytics dashboards: The progress and social reference frame and occupational self‐efficacy

Author:

Gallagher Timothy1ORCID,Slof Bert2ORCID,van der Schaaf Marieke3ORCID,Toyoda Ryo4ORCID,Tehreem Yusra56ORCID,Garcia Fracaro Sofia78ORCID,Kester Liesbeth1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Education Department Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands

2. Curriculum Research Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development Amersfoort The Netherlands

3. Utrecht Center for Research and Development of Health Professions Education University Medical Centre Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands

4. School of Engineering (Chemical Engineering) Newcastle University Newcastle Upon Tyne UK

5. Faculty of Technology University of Applied Sciences Emden/Leer Emden Germany

6. Cluster of Excellence Cognitive Interaction Technology Bielefeld University Bielefeld Germany

7. Site Management ‐ Group Engineering Merck KGaA Darmstadt Germany

8. Chemical Engineering KU Leuven Leuven Belgium

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe potential of learning analytics dashboards in virtual reality simulation‐based training environments to influence occupational self‐efficacy via self‐reflection phase processes in the Chemical industry is still not fully understood. Learning analytics dashboards provide feedback on learner performance and offer points of comparison (i.e., comparison with one's own past performance or comparison with peer performance) to help learners make sense of their feedback.ObjectivesWe present a theoretical framework for describing learning analytics reference frames and investigate the impact of feedback delivered through dashboards with different reference frames on occupational self‐efficacy, while controlling for workplace self‐reflection.MethodsThis experimental study engaged 42 chemical operator employees, aged between 18 and 55 years, each with at least one year of experience. We utilised a two‐group design to ask two research question each with three competing hypotheses related to changes in occupational self‐efficacy, employing Bayesian informative hypothesis evaluation.Results and ConclusionsResults for the primary research question suggest that dashboards with progress reference frames do not elicit greater change to self‐efficacy than those with social reference frames, however, they may elicit equal change. Furthermore, dashboards with social reference frames may elicit greater change to self‐efficacy than those with progress reference frames. Exploratory results found that dashboards with progress reference frames may elicit greater positive directional change than those with social reference frames and that they may elicit equal directional change.These findings contribute to the understanding of self‐efficacy beliefs within the Chemical industry, with potential impacts on skill development. The research may inform the design of targeted interventions and training programs to influence self‐efficacy. From a practical perspective, this research suggests that careful consideration is needed when choosing reference frames in learning analytics dashboards due to their potential consequences on the formation of learner self‐efficacy.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Education

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3