American Midwifery Certification Board Certification Demographic and Employment Data, 2016 to 2020: The Certified Nurse‐Midwife and Certified Midwife Workforce

Author:

Thumm E. Brie1ORCID,Emeis Cathy L.23,Snapp Carol34,Doublestein Lydia4,Rees Rebecca1,Vanderlaan Jennifer5ORCID,Tanner Tanya15

Affiliation:

1. American Midwifery Certification Board Research Committee College of Nursing University of Colorado Aurora Colorado

2. School of Nursing Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon

3. College of Nursing and Public Health Chamberlain University Addison Illinois

4. School of Nursing University of Nevada Las Vegas Nevada

5. Frontier Nursing University Versailles Kentucky

Abstract

IntroductionExpansion and diversification of the midwifery workforce is a federal strategy to address the maternal health crisis in the United States. Understanding characteristics of the current midwifery workforce is essential to creating approaches to its development. Certified nurse‐midwives and certified midwives (CNMs/CMs) certified by the American Midwifery Certification Board (AMCB) constitute the largest portion of the US midwifery workforce. This article aims to describe the current midwifery workforce based on data collected from all AMCB‐certified midwives at the time of certification.MethodsMidwife initial certificants and recertificants were administered an electronic survey about personal and practice characteristics at the time of certification by AMCB between 2016 and 2020 for administrative purposes. Given the standard 5‐year certification cycle, every midwife certified during this period completed the survey once. The AMCB Research Committee conducted a secondary data analysis of deidentified data to describe the CNM/CM workforce.ResultsIn 2020 there were 12,997 CNMs/CMs in the United States. The workforce was largely White and female with an average age of 49. There has been a slow increase (15% to 21%) of initial certificants identifying as midwives of color. The proportion of CMs to all AMCB‐certified midwives remained less than 2%. Physician‐owned practices were the most common employer. Approximately 60% of midwives attend births, and hospitals were the most common birth setting. Over 10% of those certified to practice reported not working within the discipline of midwifery.DiscussionTargeted recruitment and retention of midwives must take into consideration not just expansion but dispersion, scope of practice, and diversification. The proportion of midwives attending births was lower than reported in previous years. Expansion of the CM credential and accessible educational pathways are 2 potential solutions to workforce growth. Developing strategies to retain those who are trained but not practicing presents an opportunity for workforce maintenance.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Maternity and Midwifery,Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reference45 articles.

1. TikkanenR GunjaMZ FitzGeraldM ZephyrinL.Maternal mortality and maternity care in the United States compared to 10 other developed countries. Issue Brief.Commonwealth Fund;2020. doi:10.26099/411v‐9255

2. Intrapartum Care and Experiences of Women with Midwives Versus Obstetricians in the Listening to Mothers in California Survey

3. Midwifery and obstetrics: Factors influencing mothers’ satisfaction with the birth experience

4. American College of Nurse‐Midwives.Annual Report 2020. The Year of the Nurse and the Midwife: Overcoming Challenges Preparing for Growth.American College of Nurse‐Midwives;2020.https://www.midwife.org/ACNM‐Annual‐Reports

5. Fact sheet: President Biden's and Vice President Harris's maternal health blueprint delivers for women mothers and families. News release. The White House; June 24 2022. Accessed July 12 2022.https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing‐room/statements‐releases/2022/06/24/fact‐sheet‐president‐bidens‐maternal‐health‐blueprint‐delivers‐for‐women‐mothers‐and‐families/

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Midwifery Students’ Experiences of Bias in the Clinical Setting: Prevalence, Types, and Impact;Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health;2024-08-07

2. The Availability of Midwifery Care in Rural United States Communities;Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health;2024-07-23

3. The History of Midwifery in the United States;Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing;2024-04

4. ACNM’s Commentary on the Midwifery Workforce in the US;Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing;2024-04

5. Weight Bias Among Certified Nurse‐Midwives and Certified Midwives: Findings From a National Sample;Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health;2024-03-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3