The Availability of Midwifery Care in Rural United States Communities

Author:

Sheffield Emily C.12ORCID,Fritz Alyssa H.12,Interrante Julia D.12,Kozhimannil Katy Backes12

Affiliation:

1. University of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center University of Minnesota School of Public Health Minneapolis Minnesota

2. Division of Health Policy and Management University of Minnesota School of Public Health Minneapolis Minnesota

Abstract

IntroductionAccess to pregnancy‐related and childbirth‐related health care for rural residents is limited by health workforce shortages in the United States. Although midwives are key pregnancy and childbirth care providers, the current landscape of the rural midwifery workforce is not well understood. The goal of this analysis was to describe the availability of local midwifery care in rural US communities.MethodsWe developed and conducted a national survey of rural US hospitals with current or recently closed childbirth services. Maternity unit managers or administrators at 292 rural hospitals were surveyed from March to August 2021, with 133 hospitals responding (response rate 46%; 93 currently offering childbirth services, 40 recently closed childbirth services). This cross‐sectional analysis describes whether rural hospitals with current or prior childbirth services had midwifery care with certified nurse‐midwives available locally and whether rural communities with and without midwifery care differed by hospital‐level and county‐level characteristics.ResultsAmong hospitals surveyed, 55% of those with current and 75% of those with prior childbirth services reported no locally available midwifery care. Of the 93 rural communities with current hospital‐based childbirth services, those without midwifery care were more likely to have lower populations (37% vs 33%); majority populations that were Black, Indigenous, and people of color (24% vs 10%); and hospitals where at least 50% of births were Medicaid funded (77% vs 64%), compared with communities with midwifery care. Conversely, communities with midwifery care more often had greater than 30% of patients traveling more than 30 miles for hospital‐based childbirth services (38% vs 28%).DiscussionMore than half of rural hospitals surveyed reported no locally available midwifery care, and availability differed by hospital‐level and county‐level characteristics. Efforts to ensure pregnancy and childbirth care access for rural birthing people should include attention to the availability of local midwifery care.

Funder

Federal Office of Rural Health Policy

Health Resources and Services Administration

Publisher

Wiley

Reference50 articles.

1. CDC WONDER Natality Database 2016‐2022 expanded.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. Accessed February 15 2024.https://wonder.cdc.gov/natality‐expanded‐current.html

2. Changes in Hospital-Based Obstetric Services in Rural US Counties, 2014-2018

3. The Rural Obstetric Workforce in US Hospitals: Challenges and Opportunities

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3