Best practices in new product development and innovation: Results from PDMA's 2021 global survey

Author:

Knudsen Mette Praest12ORCID,von Zedtwitz Max345ORCID,Griffin Abbie6,Barczak Gloria7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center for Integrative Innovation Management University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark

2. Technology for Change Ecole Polytechnique Paris France

3. Department of International Economics, Government and Business Copenhagen Business School Frederiksberg Denmark

4. School of Economics and Business Kaunas University of Technology Kaunas Lithuania

5. GLORAD Center for Global R&D and Innovation Research Shanghai China

6. Department of Marketing University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA

7. Marketing Group, D'Amore‐McKim School of Business Northeastern University Boston Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractExtending 30 years of NPD best practice studies, this paper presents the results of the most recent 2021 global best practice survey on product development management practices conducted by the Product Development & Management Association (PDMA). With responses from 651 companies in 37 countries, the results reveal once again that no single capability is necessary or sufficient to explain the best performance. The Best firms rely on the skillful combination of multiple new product development (NPD) practices to achieve greater overall innovation success. However, for the first time in this series of research, having an innovation strategy that encourages radical innovation, is oriented toward risk‐taking and long‐term, and strives for growth through new markets and new technologies is now a more important component of these practices than was previously found. Further results regarding the practices of the Best are discussed in the paper, and implications are provided.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management

Reference17 articles.

1. Am Jordan Bar LauraFurstenthal FelicitasJorge andEricRoth.2020.Innovation in a Crisis: Why it is More Critical Than Ever. McKinsey & Company September 11 2022https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/innovation-in-a-crisis-why-it-is-more-critical-than-ever

2. Baratta Angelo.2006.“The Triple Constraint: A Triple Illusion.” PMI® Global Congress 2006 North America Seattle WA.

3. PERSPECTIVE: Trends and Drivers of Success in NPD Practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA Best Practices Study*

4. Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3