Reflections on a Feminist Psychology of Women: Paradoxes and Prospects

Author:

Fine Michelle1

Affiliation:

1. University of Pennsylvania

Abstract

The articles published in Psychology of Women Quarterly provide both testimony to the progress made by feminist psychologists and an opportunity for critical self reflection on this literature. This paper reports an analysis of the methods and conclusions of articles published in Psychology of Women Quarterly from 1978 through 1981. The analysis was undertaken to document what has been accomplished by the psychology of women literature, to identify vestiges of traditional psychology reproduced within this literature, to examine conceptual paradoxes introduced by attempts to generate a feminist psychology, and to articulate prospects for a fuller realization of a feminist psychology. Three paradoxes, examined in detail, emerge from feminist psychology's commitment to contextual validity: the presumption of “progressive progress”; the implication of internal causes for social conditions; and the advancement of individualistic change strategies. The analysis concludes with recommendations for enhancing the contextual validity of feminist psychology.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Gender Studies

Cited by 61 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Psychology of Women Quarterly: Citation Network Analysis of Its Landscape and Evolution;Psychology of Women Quarterly;2022-08-25

2. Critical Perspectives in Political Psychology;The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology;2022-02-28

3. Diversifying Perspectives in Political Psychology;The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology;2022-02-28

4. Graduate education in qualitative methods in U.S. psychology: current trends and recommendations for the future;Qualitative Research in Psychology;2017-11-21

5. Conceptual Disruption;Psychology of Women Quarterly;2017-09-19

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3