Adaptations in athletic performance and muscle architecture are not meaningfully conditioned by training free‐weight versus machine‐based exercises: Challenging a traditional assumption using the velocity‐based method

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAlthough the superior effectiveness of free‐weight over machine‐based training has been a traditionally widespread assumption, longitudinal studies comparing these training modalities were scarce and heterogeneous.ObjectiveThis research used the velocity‐based method to compare the effects of free‐weight and machine‐based resistance training on athletic performance and muscle architecture.MethodsThirty‐four resistance‐trained men participated in an 8‐week resistance training program allocated into free‐weight (n = 17) or machine‐based (n = 17) groups. Training variables (intensity, intraset fatigue, and recovery) were identical for both groups, so they only differed in the use of a barbell or specific machines to execute the full squat, bench press, prone bench pull, and shoulder press exercises. The velocity‐based method was implemented to accurately adjust the planned intensity. Analysis of covariance and effect size (ES) statistics were used to compare both training modalities on a comprehensive set of athletic and muscle architecture parameters.ResultsNo between‐group differences were found for any athletic (p ≥ 0.146) and muscle architecture (p ≥ 0.184) variable. Both training modalities significantly and similarly improved vertical jump (Free‐weight: ES ≥ 0.45, p ≤ 0.001; Machine‐based: ES ≥ 0.41, p ≤ 0.001) and lower limb anaerobic capacity (Free‐weight: ES ≥ 0.39, p ≤ 0.007; Machine‐based: ES ≥ 0.31, p ≤ 0.003). Additionally, the machine‐based group meaningfully enhanced upper limb anaerobic power (ES = 0.41, p = 0.021), whereas the free‐weight group significantly improved the change of direction (ES = ‐0.54, p = 0.003) and 2/6 balance conditions analyzed (p ≤ 0.012). Changes in sprint capacity (ES ≥ ‐0.13, p ≥ 0.274), fascicle length, and pennation angle (ES ≤ 0.19, p ≥ 0.129) were not significant for either training modality.ConclusionAdaptations in athletic performance and muscle architecture would not be meaningfully influenced by the resistance modality trained.