Justice in epistemic gaps: The ‘proof paradox’ revisited-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

登录注册会员服务联系我们

Justice in epistemic gaps: The ‘proof paradox’ revisited

Published:2021-10 Issue:1 Volume:31 Page:315-333
ISSN:1533-6077
Container-title:Philosophical Issues
language:en
Short-container-title:Philosophical Issues

Author:

Ross Lewis¹

Affiliation:

1. London School of Economics and Political Science

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Philosophy

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/phis.12193

Reference48 articles.

1. Sensitivity, Causality, and Statistical Evidence in Courts of Law;Blome‐Tillmann Michael;Thought,2015

2. The use of statistical evidence of identification in civil litigation: Well‐worn hypotheticals, real cases, and controversy;Brook J.;Saint Louis University Law Journal,1984

3. Belief, credence, and norms

4. Reconceptualising the Burden of Proof;Cheng Edward;Yale Law Journal,2013

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The sensitivity of legal proof;Synthese;2024-05-13

2. The Foundations of Criminal Law Epistemology;Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy;2023-07-17

3. When International Commercial Arbitration meets China’s sanction laws: living together but remaining apart?;Journal of International Dispute Settlement;2022-09-29

4. Knowledge, individualised evidence and luck;Philosophical Studies;2022-08-25

5. The Foundations of Criminal Law Epistemology;SSRN Electronic Journal;2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线，采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统，可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容，当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种，收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇，并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询！咨询电话：010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP