Environmental filtering is the primary driver of community assembly in forest–grassland mosaics: A case study based on CSR strategies

Author:

Erdős László12ORCID,Ho Khanh Vu34ORCID,Bede‐Fazekas Ákos15ORCID,Kröel‐Dulay György1ORCID,Tölgyesi Csaba6ORCID,Bátori Zoltán67ORCID,Török Péter289ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Ecology and Botany HUN‐REN Centre for Ecological Research Vácrátót Hungary

2. HUN‐REN‐UD Functional and Restoration Ecology Research Group Debrecen Hungary

3. Doctoral School of Environmental Sciences University of Szeged Szeged Hungary

4. Faculty of Natural Resources‐Environment Kien Giang University Kien Giang Vietnam

5. Department of Environmental and Landscape Geography, Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences ELTE Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary

6. MTA‐SZTE ‘Momentum’ Applied Ecology Research Group University of Szeged Szeged Hungary

7. Department of Ecology University of Szeged Szeged Hungary

8. Department of Ecology University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

9. Polish Academy of Sciences, Botanical Garden – Center for Biological Diversity Conservation in Powsin Warszawa Poland

Abstract

AbstractAimsEcological strategies can provide information about plant community assembly and its main drivers. Our aim was to reveal the dominant strategies of the vegetation types of forest–grassland mosaics and to deduce the assembly processes responsible for their species composition.LocationHungary.MethodsWe investigated eight vegetation types of Hungarian forest–steppes. The trade‐off between three key traits related to leaf size and economics was used to calculate Grime's competitive–stress tolerance–ruderal (CSR) value for each species, based on which the mean value for each vegetation type was determined. Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) ordination was used to reveal the compositional differences among the vegetation types under study. To analyze how ecological strategies correlate with the compositional gradient, we used linear regression between plot ordination scores (the first DCA scores) and each strategy (C, S, and R). Linear mixed‐effect models were used to evaluate the differences between the vegetation types regarding each strategy (C, S, and R).ResultsEach vegetation type was dominated by the stress‐tolerator strategy, indicating the prominent role of environmental filtering in community assembly. However, ecological strategies differed significantly among the communities. The importance of the stress‐tolerator strategy decreased toward the less harsh end of the gradient (i.e., from grasslands to forests), while the competitor strategy showed a reverse pattern. The ruderal strategy was weakly correlated with the gradient, although its proportion increased toward the harsh end of the gradient.ConclusionsWith ongoing climate change, an increasing importance of environmental filtering is expected in the assembly of the vegetation types in the studied forest–grassland mosaics. We suggest that CSR strategies offer a useful tool for studying plant‐community assembly rules along environmental gradients.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3